SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 410

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sandeep Sharma, J.
Diwakar Dev Sharma - Appellant
Vs.
Railway Police Force and Anr. - Respondent
CrMMO No. 168 of 2021
Decided On : 23-02-2026

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. V. B. Verma, Senior Panel Counsel, Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General

High Court under Cr.P.C. Section 482 quashed FIR under Railways Act Section 153 against elected representative who only facilitated sewerage pipeline sanction near tracks, finding no wilful act or omission causing safety endangerment as execution deviated under railway supervision.

Headnote:(A) Railways Act, 1989 - Section 153 - Cr.P.C. - Section 482 - Endangering safety of persons travelling by railway by wilful act or omission - Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash FIR where petitioner, elected representative, raised issue and facilitated sanction for laying sewerage pipeline parallel and crossing railway track but had no role in execution which deviated from approved plan by using concrete blocks instead of clamping method and erecting electric pole - No evidence of unlawful act, wilful omission, actual endangerment or obstruction to rolling stock or traffic - No passenger complaints - Work supervised by railway authorities - Case falls within categories for quashing to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice. (Paras 2-6, 16-21)

(B) Cr.P.C. - Section 482 - Inherent powers of High Court - Guidelines from precedents: quash if proceedings manifestly malafide, allegations do not constitute offence, no legal evidence, patently absurd, capricious process issuance, fundamental defects, or continuation abuse of process - Step-by-step test: material sound/indubitable ruling out assertions, unrefuted, trial abuse - Sparingly exercised with caution. (Paras 8-15)

Facts of the case:
Elected councilor raised public interest issue of sewerage line through area abutting railway track. Permissions granted post deposit for pipeline parallel to track by clamping and crossing under traffic block by cut and cover. Executing agency deviated: blocks burst, reconstructed; electric pole erected alongside track then removed on objection. FIR registered against petitioner and officials for endangering safety despite railway supervision.

Findings of Court:
Petitioner not involved in on-site execution by agency under railway oversight; deviations not attributable to petitioner; no imminent danger or obstruction occurred.

Issues: Whether allegations disclose offence under Section 153; whether material justifies quashing under Section 482 given petitioner's limited role in sanction.

Ratio Decidendi: Applying binding precedents, prosecution case bound to fail as no wilful act/omission by petitioner endangering safety; only raised/sanctioned public facility work; execution by others; quashing prevents harassment via protracted trial culminating in acquittal.

Result: Petition allowed; FIR and proceedings quashed and set aside; petitioner acquitted of charges.

Table of Content
1. sewerage pipeline project approved near railway track. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. contention on petitioner's role in violations. (Para 5 , 6)
3. high court power to quash under section 482 crpc. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. representative not liable for execution deviations. (Para 16 , 17)
5. no wilful railway safety endangerment under section 153. (Para 18 , 19)
6. quash fir to prevent process abuse. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT :
Sandeep Sharma, J.

By way of instant petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.PC, read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, prayer has been made by the petitioner, who at the relevant time, was elected Councilor of Municipal Corporation, Shimla, for quashing of case crime No. 53 of 2020 dated 18.12.2020, registered under Section 153 of the Railways Act, 1989 (in short the “Act”) titled as State v. Diwakar Dev Sharma, alongwith further proceedings arising therefrom against him as well as notice dated 28.2.2021 (Annexure P-10) issued by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla.

2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the record are that petitioner being elected Councilor of ward No. 7, Municipal Corporation, Shimla, raised issue of laying sewerage line through Nalah/track by Municipal Corporation, Shimla. Authorities concerned after having checked the feasibility found that entire land adjoining to ward No. 7 is abutting railway line and accordingly, took up the matter with railway authorities. Municipal Corporation, Shimla preferred online application dated 3.7.2018 to DRM Ambala/Engineer Northern Railway for the purpose of laying drainage/sewerage line. Pursuant to afore application dated 3.7.2018, Senior Divisional Engineer-HQ, Northern Railway, Ambala Cantt. sent a communication dated 6.11.2018, thereby according permission for crossing of drainage/sewerage pipeline at Km88/12 and 89/6 between Tara Devi and Jutogh stations, subject to deposit of Rs. 17,43,042/- towards estimate charges. Municipal Corporation, Shimla, deposited the afore amount, whereafter railway authorities granted permission to lay drainage/sewerage pipeline between Tara Devi and Jutogh under the supervision of the railway authorities. Allegedly, Municipal Corporation, Shimla, did not lay the drainage/sewerage line properly, as a result of which, blocks constructed got burst before its functioning and very purpose of laying the pipeline could not be achieved. Municipal Corporation, Shimla reconstructed the required blocks properly from the hard surface for the support of sewerage pipeline and made the same functional for facility of general public. According to the approved plan, DI pipeline was required to be laid from km88.717 to Km.89.307 parallel to the railway boundary through clamping method to the right side of the track, wherafter it was to cross the railway track at Km. 89.307 by cut and cover method under traffic block and after that it was to be laid parallel to the railway track from Km.89.307 to Km.89.400 by clamping method to the left side of the track.

3. Allegedly, Junior Engineer, Sewerage Division Tutikandi, Shimla (now known as SJPNL) i.e. executing agency did not follow the approved/sanctioned plans/tracks. Since number of discrepancies were found on the spot, railway authorities repeatedly sent notices to the executing agency i.e. Municipal Corporation, Shimla. However, no much heed was paid to the same, rather allegedly, petitioner, who at the relevant time, was councilor of the ward concerned, insisted to erect electric pole alongside the railway line thereby endangering the safety of persons travelling in the railway. In the aforesaid background, criminal case under Section 153 of Act came to be instituted against the petitioner and two other officials namely Manish Rana and Veer Singh Parihar.

4. Since after completion of investigation, railway authorities submitted the challan in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shimla and same is pen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top