IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA
Dashrath Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Bail petitioner, Dashrath Singh, who is in custody since 13.04.2021, has come up before this Court, seeking regular bail under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [hereinafter referred to as 'BNSS'], originating from FIR No.32 of 2021, dated 11.04.2021, under Sections 302 of the Indian Penal Code registered at Police Station Nahan, District Sirmour, [HP].
FACTUAL MATRIX IN INSTANT BAIL PETITION:
2. Case set up by Learned Senior Counsel is that bail petitioner has been falsely implicated and he has no connection with the alleged offence. It is averred that an FIR No 32 of 2021, dated 11.04.2021 was registered under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code but the petitioner has no role in the aforesaid accusation. It is averred that on 11.04.2021, that one Shri Jittu has telephonically informed to police of Police Station Majra that a scuffle took place at Jogiban and on the basis of alleged information police of Police Station Nahan went to alleged place and telephonically contacted Jittu, upon which Jittu disclosed that he escaped from place of occurrence and his friend Maan Singh was allegedly killed by Dashrath and his dead body of decease
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia versus State of Punjab
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar versus Rajesh Ranjan
P. Chidambaram versus Directorate of Enforcement
Bail granted in murder case due to hostile key witness rendering prima facie accusation doubtful, prolonged incarceration over four years amid delayed trial, no antecedents, upholding Article 21 pers....
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; prolonged incarceration without trial violates the right to personal liberty and speedy trial.
Bail can be granted even under stringent laws like the NDPS Act when prolonged incarceration occurs without trial, emphasizing personal liberty and the presumption of innocence.
In NDPS cases with intermediate contraband quantity, over one-year incarceration and trial delay violate Article 21 speedy trial right, entitling bail despite antecedents as State cannot oppose on cr....
Prolonged incarceration without trial violates the right to personal liberty under Article 21, necessitating the grant of bail even under stringent provisions like the NDPS Act if no reasonable groun....
Prolonged incarceration and trial delay in NDPS case with intermediate quantity constitute change in circumstances for successive bail, enforcing speedy trial right under Article 21 despite prior rej....
Successive bail in NDPS intermediate quantity case granted due to Article 21 speedy trial violation from long incarceration and trial delay, despite prior rejection and antecedents.
Bail is a rule and jail is an exception; prolonged detention without trial violates personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Bail is granted when no prima facie case exists against the accused, emphasizing the right to personal liberty under Article 21, especially during prolonged incarceration and delay in trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.