SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1146

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.
H.P. State Cooperative Bank Limited  - Petitioner
Versus
Nirmla Devi  - Respondent
CMPMO No. 615 of 2022
Decided on: 23-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Y.P. Sood, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma, Advocate.

Disputes arising from leases between lessors and lessees do not fall under Section 72 of the Co-operative Societies Act for arbitration.

Headnote:(A) Co-operative Societies Act, 1968 - Section 72 - Dispute between lessor and lessee - The petitioner contested the maintainability of the respondent's petition under Section 72, as the dispute did not fall within the prescribed categories for arbitration. (Para 9)

(B) The Court highlighted that the jurisdictional error occurred since the respondent's claim arose out of a lease agreement, not as a member of the society. (Para 12)

Facts of the case:
The respondent leased property to the petitioner Bank, but it faced termination, leading to arbitration proceedings which were deemed improper by the court.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the impugned orders were unsustainable, as the dispute was between a lessor and a lessee, not within the purview of Section 72.

Issues: Whether the dispute referred could be arbitrated under Section 72.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined the dispute by its nature was not subject to arbitration under the Co-operative Societies Act, leading to the quashing of previous orders. (Paras 9, 12)

Result: Petition allowed and previous orders quashed.

JUDGMENT :

AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.

By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following relief:-

“It is, therefore, prayed that this petition may kindly be allowed and impugned Order Annexure P-5 passed by the Ld. Arbitrator Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies (Central Division) Mandi District Mandi, Himachal Pradesh and Order Annexure P-6 by the Ld. Jt. Registrar, Cooperative Societies may kindly be ordered to be quashed and set aside and petition Annexure P-3 filed by the respondent may kindly order dismissed in the interest of justice and fair play.”

2.  Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present petition are that as per the respondent, a Lease Agreement was entered into between the respondent and the petitioner to lease out the property at Kallari on National Highway to the petitioner-Bank.
This was on account of the District Manager of the Bank in the month of June, 2016, contacting the respondent and showing his willingness to take on lease the premises in issue for opening/shifting the branch of the Bank in the premises in issue. As per the respondent, after consulting her family members the proposal was agreed to. The respondent acted thereupon and spent about Rs.4,00,000/-to make the premises ready for the occupation of the Bank. A Lease Agreement was also entered into. Monthly rent of Rs.10,000/- was fixed w.e.f. 12.07.2017, i.e. the date of the Agreement. In terms of the Lease Agreement, the lease was for a period was 15 years and the rent was to be enhanced in terms of the contents of the agreement. As per the respondent, after the execution of the Lease Deed, the Bank Authorities remained silent till January, 2019, when she received a notice regarding the termination of the lease. Feeling aggrieved, she filed a petition under Section 72 of the Co-operative Societies Act, which was allowed vide Annexure P-5, by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Society, Central Division. Feeling aggrieved by this Award, an appeal was preferred by the Bank, which was dismissed on 25.08.2021. Thereafter, a revision was preferred, which was dismissed as not maintainable on 25.08.2022 and thereafter, this petition has been filed.

3.  Learned Counsel for the petitioner-Bank argued that the impugned orders are not sustainable in the eyes of law, for the reason that the petition filed by the respondent under Section 72 of the Co-operative Societies Act was not maintainable. He submitted that the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent was not one envisaged under Section 72 of the Co-operative Societies Act and on this count, the impugned orders were liable to be set aside.

4.  On the other hand, learned Counsel for the respondent argued that there was no infirmity in the orders passed under Section 72 of the Co-operative Societies Act or in appeal. He further argued that the proceedings filed under Section 72 of the Co- operative Societies Act were maintainable and therefore, as there was not merit in the petition, the same be dismissed.

5.  I have heard learned Counsel for the parties and have also gone through the impugned orders as well as documents appended with the petition.

6.  Before referring to the documents appended with the petition, I will refer to the provisions under Section 72 of the Co- operative Societies Act. Section 72 is a part of Chapter-IX of the H.P. Co-operative Societies Act, 1968, which Chapter deals with settlement of disputes.

7.  Section 72 of the Co-operative Societies Act refers to the disputes which may be referred to Arbitration. Relevant partition whereof is quoted hereinbelow:-

“ 72. Disputes which may be referred to arbitration.-

(1)  Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, if any dispute touching the constitution, management, or the business of a  co-operative society arises-

(a)  among members, past members and persons claiming through members, past members and deceased members; or

(b)  between a member, past member or person


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top