Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Gulab Chand – Appellant
Versus
Gopal (since deceased) through Legal Representatives namely Sh. Ravinder Kapoor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suit declares wrongful tenancy entry, mutations, sales void post-1967 relinquishment (Para 1 , 2 , 14) |
| 2. civil court jurisdiction persists if land reforms procedure violated (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. dispute tenancy status, limitation, jurisdiction under hp tenancy act (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. reject plaint under o7 r11 only on plaint averments showing no cause or bar (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. plaint discloses cause; not time-barred or jurisdictionally barred; petition dismissed (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
Judgment :
Ajay Mohan Goel, J.
By way of this petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have assailed order dated 02.09.2024, passed by learned Trial Court, in terms whereof, the application filed by the petitioners herein under Order VII, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure for the rejection of the plaint has been dismissed.
2. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that the contesting respondents/plaintiffs have filed a suit for declaration against the petitioners herein which is pending adjudication. The suit has been filed in the month of June, 2015. The following prayers have been made in the in the suit:-
“It is
Plaint not rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC where averments disclose cause from challenge to recent mutations/sales based on alleged wrong entries post pre-statute tenancy relinquishment; jurisdi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering documents filed along with the plaint for deciding the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The judgment emphasized....
Suit barred due to lack of objection against record of rights; civil court jurisdiction excluded under specific statutory provisions.
A plaint must be deemed to disclose a cause of action if the statements therein, taken as true, allow for a claim to proceed, regardless of subsequent merits, as defined under CPC.
The Court upheld the rejection of the plaint, establishing that suits challenging registered documents must be filed within the designated limitation period and emphasized that clever drafting cannot....
The denial of a plaint based on limitation or absence of cause of action requires full trial; allegations of fraud establish a valid cause for litigation, demanding judicial examination.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
