SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1221

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Virender Singh, J.
Reshma @ Reshma Begum - Applicant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
Cr. MP(M) No. 2226 of 2025
Decided on : 23-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Mohinder Zharaick, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Rohit Sharma, Dy. A.G. assisted by ASI Krishan Bhandari, P.S. Puruwala, District Sirmour, H.P.

Bail granted in NDPS commercial quantity case as co-accused police custody statements inadmissible for conviction, CDRs' value for trial; Section 37 twin conditions satisfied via parity, lack of financial evidence, prima facie not guilty.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 21, 27-A and 29 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 483 - Bail application in commercial quantity case - Twin conditions under Section 37(b)(ii) satisfied where applicant’s role alleged solely on disclosures by co-accused in police custody (inadmissible for conviction) and call detail records (evidentiary value to be determined at trial); no financial transactions found; investigation complete; parity with co-accused granted bail. (Paras 11-22)

(B) Evidence Act - Sections 25 and 27 - Confessional statements to police officers under NDPS Act inadmissible; ‘custody’ includes detention prior to formal arrest. (Paras 13-15)

(C) Call detail records - Provide metadata like caller ID, duration, cell tower details but not conversation substance; value assessed during trial. (Para 16-17)

Facts of the case:
Secret information led to interception of motorcycle, recovery of 323 grams of commercial quantity contraband from two persons. Investigation revealed supply chain; applicant allegedly delivered contraband and stayed at relative’s house. Arrested later based on co-accused disclosures and call records showing contacts. Trial pending post charge-sheet.

Findings of Court:
Applicant released on bail on personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties; subject to conditions including regular court appearance, no tampering, no inducement, no leaving country without permission, monthly affidavit of no new crimes.

Issues: Whether twin conditions under Section 37 NDPS met; admissibility of co-accused custodial statements and weight of call records for bail determination; applicability of parity.

Ratio Decidendi: Role based on inadmissible custodial confessions and call records not establishing prima facie guilt; no likelihood of reoffending given deep societal roots, complete investigation; parity applicable; reasonable conditions suffice for second limb.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Table of Content
1. applicant claims innocence, no link to contraband, seeks bail. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
2. investigation uncovers heroin supply chain implicating applicant. (Para 10)
3. ndps section 37 requires twin conditions for bail. (Para 11 , 12)
4. co-accused police confessions inadmissible post-tofan singh. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
5. cdrs lack evidentiary weight at bail stage. (Para 16 , 17)
6. no finances traced; parity with co-accused granted. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
7. prima facie not guilty; bail allowed with conditions. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)

Judgment :

Virender Singh, J.

Applicant Reshma @ Reshma @ Begum has filed the present application, under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS’) for releasing her, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, arising out of FIR No. 38 of 2025, dated 22.2.2025, registered under Sections 21, 27-A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS’ Act), with Police Station, Puruwala, District Sirmour, H.P.

2. The applicant has pleaded that she is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, in the present case, at the instance of the complainant and has nothing to do with the contraband, allegedly recovered, in the present case.

3. It is the further case of the applicant that Police could not collect any evidence to connect her with the crime in question.

4. According to the applicant, investigation, in the present case, is complete and nothing is to be recovered, from her possession. All these facts have been pleaded to show that custodial interrogation of the applicant is no longer required by the Police.

5. The applicant has further pleaded that she is having deep roots in the society and there is no chance of her fleeing away from justice.

6. The applicant has tried her luck before the learned Special Judge-I, District Sirmour, H.P., however, the same was dismissed vide order dated 31.7.2025.

7. On the basis of above facts, the applicant, through her counsel, has undertaken to abide by the terms and conditions, to be imposed by this Court, in case, she is ordered to be released on bail, during pendency of the trial.

8. Learned counsel for the applicant has prayed that, on the ground of parity, the relief as claimed in the application, be granted to the applicant.

9. On these submissions, a prayer has been made to allow the bail application.

10. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 22.5.2025, Constable Dinesh Kumar, No. 342, submitted ruqua, which was sent by HC Rakesh Kumar No. 224 I.O., SIU, Nahan, for registration of the FIR, mentioning therein that on 22.2.2025 I.O., alongwith other police officials, in Govt. vehicle bearing registration No. HP 18A-6236, was on patrolling duty and on duty to detect the crime, relating to excise and narcotics. They had proceeded towards Kolar, Majra, Paonta Sahib, Puruwala, Killod side. At about 10:20 a.m., when, I.O., alongwith police team, was present at Bhuddi road bifurcation Mehruwala, then, he received a secret information that a young man, namely, Soib Khan @ Aazam and Sakib Shah, R/o Jeewangarh, Vikasnagar, are doing business of selling narcotic substance chitta/heroin and they had brought consignment of heroin from Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh and both of them are going on Motorcycle bearing registration No. UK 16C-2210, alongwith consignment of heroin from Dakpathhar to Mehruwala, towards Paonta Sahib.

10.1 As per the information, Soib Khan @ Azam was wearing a white coloured sweater and light blue coloured jeans, whereas, Sakib Shah was wearing a white and black coloured jacket and blue coloured jeans. As per the information, in case, the said persons, alongwith the motorcycle, are nabbed, then, a large quantity of chitta/heroin, could be recovered.

10.2 According to the I.O., in case, search warrants and authorization letter are obtained, in that eventuality, delay woul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top