SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1286

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Virender Singh, J. 
Parvez - Applicant
Versus
State of H.P. - Respondent
Cr. MP(M) No. 1978 of 2025
Decided On : 12-09-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. K.S. Gill, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Tejasvi Sharma and Mr. H.S. Rawat, Addl. A.G. with Mr. Rohit Sharma and Ms. Ranjna Patial, Dy.A.G., assisted by ASI Krishan Bhandari, Police Station, Puruwala, District Sirmour, H.P.

The court emphasized that mere allegations and statements from co-accused do not suffice for denying bail; there must be substantial evidence establishing a prima facie case.

Headnote:(A) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act - Sections 21, 27-A and 29 - Bail application - Applicant sought bail under Section 483 of BNSS during trial for alleged narcotics possession - Denial of bail grounded on allegations and evidence from co-accused - Court considered the lack of substantial evidence connecting applicant to crime, emphasizing the need for strong prima facie case - Prior offenses and co-accused statements deemed insufficient - Conditions imposed alongside bail regarding attendance, evidence tampering, and travel restrictions. (Paras 9, 10, 17, 19)

(B) Evidence - Role of co-accused revelations in bail considerations - Supreme Court precedent on admissibility of confessions from co-accused noted - Emphasis on the evidentiary value determined during trial phase. (Paras 11, 12, 14)

Table of Content
1. court grants bail after analyzing evidence and connection to the alleged crime. (Para 1 , 19)
2. applicant asserts innocence and lack of substantial evidence. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
3. bail conditions outlined to safeguard the trial integrity. (Para 5 , 6 , 10)
4. arguments focus on the admissibility of co-accused testimonies and cdrs. (Para 8 , 11)
5. court emphasizes the need for a prima facie case to deny bail. (Para 9 , 17)

JUDGMENT :

Virender Singh, J.

Applicant Parvez has filed the present application, under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS ’) for releasing him, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, arising out of FIR No. 38 of 2025, dated 22.2.2025, registered under Sections 21 , 27-A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS’ Act), with Police Station, Puruwala, District Sirmour, H.P.

2. The applicant has pleaded the fact that he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, in the present case, at the instance of the complainant and has nothing to do with the contraband, allegedly recovered, in the present case.

3. It is the further case of the applicant that Police could not collect any evidence to connect him with the crime in question.

4. According to the applicant, investigation, in the present case, is complete and nothing is to be recovered, from his possession. All these facts have been pleaded to show that custodial interrogation of the applicant is no longer required by the Police.

5. Relief of bail has also been sought on the grounds that ground of arrest were not served upon the applicant.

6. On the basis of above facts, the applicant, through his counsel, has undertaken to abide by the terms and conditions, to be imposed by this Court, in case, he is ordered to be released on bail, during pendency of the trial.

7. On these submissions, a prayer has been made to allow the bail application.

8. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 22.5.2025, Constable Dinesh Kumar, No. 342, submitted ruqua, which was sent by HC Rakesh Kumar No. 224 I.O., SIU, Nahan, for registration of the FIR, mentioning therein that on 22.2.2025 I.O., alongwith other police officials, in Govt. vehicle bearing registration No. HP 18A-6236, was on patrolling duty and on duty to detect the crime, relating to excise and narcotics. They had proceeded towards Kolar, Majra, Paonta Sahib, Puruwala, Killod side. At about 10:20 a.m., when, I.O., alongwith police team, was present at Bhuddi road bifurcation Mehruwala, then, he received a secret information that a young man, namely, Soib Khan @ Aazam and Sakib Shah, R/o Jeewangarh, Vikasnagar, are doing business of selling narcotic substance chitta/heroin and they had brought consignment of heroin from Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh and both of them are going on Motorcycle bearing registration No. UK 16C-2210, alongwith consignment of heroin from Dakpathhar to Mehruwala, towards Paonta Sahib.

8.1 As per the information, Soib Khan @ Azam was wearing a white coloured sweater and light blue coloured jeans, whereas, Sakib Shah was wearing a white and black coloured jacket and blue coloured jeans. As per the information, in case, the said persons, alongwith the motorcycle, are nabbed, then, a large quantity of chitta/heroin, could be recovered.

8.2 According to the I.O., in case, search warrants and authorization letter are obtained, in that eventuality, delay would be occurred and the contraband could be removed from there.

8.3 The information was found to be authentic and reliable, upon which, the I.O. complied with the provisions of Section 42 (2) of the NDPS Act.

8.4 In the meanwhile, on the spot, one motorcycle bearing registration No. HP-17E-7073 was noticed. The said motorcycle was signalled to stop and the rider of the motorcycle and the pillion rider were inquired about their names and addresses. On inquiry, the rider disclosed his name as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top