Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH
Parvez – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court grants bail after analyzing evidence and connection to the alleged crime. (Para 1 , 19) |
| 2. applicant asserts innocence and lack of substantial evidence. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. bail conditions outlined to safeguard the trial integrity. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 4. arguments focus on the admissibility of co-accused testimonies and cdrs. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 5. court emphasizes the need for a prima facie case to deny bail. (Para 9 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
Virender Singh, J.
Applicant Parvez has filed the present application, under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS ’) for releasing him, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, arising out of FIR No. 38 of 2025, dated 22.2.2025, registered under Sections 21 , 27-A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS’ Act), with Police Station, Puruwala, District Sirmour, H.P.
2. The applicant has pleaded the fact that he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, in the present case, at the instance of the complainant and has nothing to do with the contraband, allegedly recovered, in the present case.
3. It is the further case of the app
The court emphasized that mere allegations and statements from co-accused do not suffice for denying bail; there must be substantial evidence establishing a prima facie case.
Bail granted in commercial quantity NDPS case where evidence solely from inadmissible co-accused police confessions and CDRs (trial-stage evaluation), no financial links, investigation complete, pari....
In commercial quantity NDPS cases, co-accused confessional statements to police inadmissible; CDRs' evidentiary value for trial; bail granted where prima facie not guilty based on weak links, parity,....
Bail granted in NDPS commercial quantity case as co-accused police custody statements inadmissible for conviction, CDRs' value for trial; Section 37 twin conditions satisfied via parity, lack of fina....
In NDPS commercial quantity bail, confessional statements to police inadmissible; CDRs' evidentiary value at trial. Absence of financial links, reliance on shelter allegation insufficient for prima f....
The court ruled that involvement of an accused must be substantiated by adequate evidence, and statements by co-accused cannot solely establish guilt under the NDPS Act.
The court ruled that statements made under police influence are inadmissible against co-accused in NDPS cases, allowing bail due to lack of prima facie evidence.
Bail granted in NDPS commercial quantity case where proprietor absent from raid site, linked only by inadmissible co-accused custody statement and expired rent agreement, satisfying Section 37 condit....
Co-accused's police custody disclosures inadmissible against applicant in NDPS cases; mere call detail records between co-villagers insufficient to deny bail; parity with released co-accused entitles....
In NDPS commercial quantity cases, bail granted where accused involvement relies solely on co-accused's custodial disclosure statement, inadmissible under evidence law, satisfying Section 37 twin con....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
