SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1287

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, RANJAN SHARMA, JJ.
Ashok Kumar Sharma And Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State of H.P. And Ors. - Respondents
LPA No. 162 of 2022 a/w LPA No. 10 of 2023
Decided On : 09-10-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Dilip Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Sharma, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Additional, Advocate General and Mr. Balwinder Singh, Deputy Advocate General, Mr. R. K. Bawa, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Abhinav Thakur, Mr. Ajay Kumar Sharma Advocate

Diploma Junior Engineers acquiring AMIE/degree during service eligible for promotion post-3 years; pre-acquisition service not counted for seniority, as they enter graduate quota impacting original graduates.

Headnote:(A) Recruitment and Promotion Rules - Assistant Engineers (Civil) - Bifurcated quotas for Junior Engineers: graduate at appointment (3 years service), diploma holders acquiring AMIE/degree during service (3 years post-acquisition), unqualified diploma holders (7/15 years) - Diploma holders acquiring qualification enter graduate promotion stream post-eligibility - Pre-acquisition service not countable for eligibility or inter se seniority, to avoid impacting original graduate entrants - Seniority lists applying post-acquisition reckoning upheld; prior service equates to longer diploma quota service. (Paras 8-16, 17-19, 30-35, 51)

(B) Seniority - Inter se among diploma holders promoted under acquisition quota - Not watertight compartment; post-promotion, compete in unified graduate stream for further advancement - Counting initial appointment date creates anomaly, e.g., later appointee/earlier promoter junior to later promoter - Eligibility date governs to prevent injustice to other categories. (Paras 28-30, 49-50, 54-55)

Facts of the case:
Diploma holder Junior Engineers appointed at varying dates acquired AMIE/degree during service at different times, promoted under 10% quota after 3 years post-acquisition. Seniority revised excluding pre-acquisition service per prior rulings; original petitioners challenged lists claiming seniority from initial appointment date; Single Judge allowed writ quashing lists to that extent; State and private respondents appealed.

Findings of Court:
Impugned Single Judge judgment set aside; representations rejecting petitioners' claim and original seniority lists dated 01.03.2014 and 01.03.2016 restored.

Issues: Whether inter se seniority of diploma Junior Engineers promoted after acquiring AMIE/degree during service reckoned from entire service including pre-acquisition period, without impacting graduate Junior Engineers quota.

Ratio Decidendi: Rules create distinct eligibility streams; diploma holders acquiring qualification eligible only post-3 years as 'graduates', prior service not substitutable for graduate experience - Seniority follows eligibility date, as pre-period ineligible for quota; upholds scheme distinguishing qualification-based service quality, preventing queue-jumping or reversal of actual promotion sequence.

Result: Appeals allowed; writ petition dismissed.

Table of Content
1. appeals challenge single judge seniority order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. promotion rules evolve with qualification quotas. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. quotas differentiate by entry qualification service. (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
4. kutlehria drives post-amie seniority reckoning. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
5. total je service governs inter-se seniority. (Para 25 , 26)
6. acquirers compete with initial graduates compartment. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30)
7. eligibility date post-qualification sets seniority. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 38)
8. dual paths: amie quota or 7-year service. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)
9. promotion joins graduate ae class seniority. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)
10. prior service count disrupts settled seniority. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57)

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Singh Thakur, J.

In both appeals, judgment dated 22.07.2022, passed by learned Single Judge of this High Court in CWP No. 3773 of 2021, titled Shashi Kant & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors., has been assailed by the State of Himachal Pradesh as well as private respondents. Therefore, these appeals, for involvement of common question of law and facts to be adjudicated, are being decided by this Common judgment.

2. Parties herein shall be referred as per their status in writ petition.

3. LPA No. 162 of 2022 has been filed by the private respondents whereas LPA No. 10 of 2023 has been filed by the State of Himachal Pradesh.

4. Petitioners in CWP No.3773 of 2023 (respondents herein), who were serving as Assistant Engineers in HPPWD Department, filed the said petition, seeking following substantial reliefs:-

‘i) For quashing and setting aside Annexure P-13 rejecting representation of the petitioner.

ii) for holding that review DPCs held by the respondents in respect of promotion of petitioners/private respondent JE (AMIE) to the post of Assistant Engineers (PWD) as well as the resultant re-drawn seniority list of AE vide Annexure P-7 dated 1.3.2014 and vide Annexure P-8 dated 1.3.2016 qua the petitioners and private respondents are illegal and may kindly be quashed and set aside. Consequently, all actions taken on the basis of these lists w.r.t. petitioners and private respondents be also declared illegal and void.

iii) for directing the respondents not to apply the judgment of SS Kutlehria for counting seniority.’

5. Petitioners and private respondents (in writ petition) were appointed as Diploma Holder Junior Engineers in unified HPPWD Department as it was existing before its bifurcation in the year, 1994.

6. On 27.04.1994, HPPWD Department was bifurcated in two separate departments i.e. HPPWD (B&R) and Irrigation & Public Health Department.

7. Diploma holder Junior Engineers were one amongst other categories of Junior Engineers in the feeder cadre for promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer.

8. Before bifurcation R&P Rules to the post of Assistant Engineer in unified HPPWD Department were notified on 18.09.1978 (1978 Rules). As per these Rules, 40% quota was meant for direct recruitment and 60% by promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer. Out of 60% Promotion quota, 10% quota was allotted to the Graduate Junior Engineers, who were possessing Graduation Degree at the time of their induction/appointment as Junior Engineers, having 3 years regular or ad-hoc service or both as such and those Junior Engineers who passed Sections A and B of AMIE with five years regular or ad-hoc service or both as such. The relevant provisions were as under:

‘11. Promotion:

(i) From amongst Sectional Officers having 7 years regular or adhoc service or both as such and un qualified Sectional Officers with at least 15 years’ regular or ad-hoc service or both as such

…………………45%

(ii) Draftsman cadre, who have passed at least Matriculation or its equivalent examination and possess a two years’ diploma in draftsmen course from a recognised Institution having 10 years rgular or ad-hoc service or both as such

………5%

(iii) From amo








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top