IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, RANJAN SHARMA
Ashok Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeals challenge single judge seniority order. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. promotion rules evolve with qualification quotas. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. quotas differentiate by entry qualification service. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. kutlehria drives post-amie seniority reckoning. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. total je service governs inter-se seniority. (Para 25 , 26) |
| 6. acquirers compete with initial graduates compartment. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 7. eligibility date post-qualification sets seniority. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 38) |
| 8. dual paths: amie quota or 7-year service. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 9. promotion joins graduate ae class seniority. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51) |
| 10. prior service count disrupts settled seniority. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
JUDGMENT :
Vivek Singh Thakur, J.
In both appeals, judgment dated 22.07.2022, passed by learned Single Judge of this High Court in CWP No. 3773 of 2021, titled Shashi Kant & Ors. vs. State of H.P. & Ors., has been assailed by the State of Himachal Pradesh as well as private respondents. Therefore, these appeals, for involvement of common question of law and
Shailendra Dania’s and others vs. S.P. Dubey & Ors.
D. Stephen Joseph vs. Union of India and others
A. K. Raghumani Singh and others vs. Gopal Chandra Nath and others
Indian Airlines Ltd. and others vs. S. Gopalakrishnan
Dalip Kumar Garg and another vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
K. Ajiot Babu and othrs vs. Union of India and others
Diploma Junior Engineers acquiring AMIE/degree during service eligible for promotion post-3 years; pre-acquisition service not counted for seniority, as they enter graduate quota impacting original g....
Point of Law : Public orders made by public authorities are meant to have public effect and are intended to effect actings and conduct of those to whom they are addressed and must be construed object....
Promotion – In absence of any statutory provision or rule made thereunder or under proviso appended to Article 309 of Constitution of India, once an incumbent is appointed to post according to rules,....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that for accelerated promotion to the post of SDE, the experience of service must be counted from the date of acquiring the AMIE/BE degree, as per ....
Amended promotion rules' 45% quota for Junior Engineers with 7 years service contains no Diploma/Degree requirement; unqualified seniors eligible; DPC rejection on qualification grounds invalid.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the requisition for promotion to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) was sent in compliance with the statutory rules, and the Rules, 1968 p....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the reservation system between Graduate and Diploma Engineers, as provided by Rule 22(5)(a) of the Mizoram Engineering Service (Amendment) Rul....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.