IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA, J.
State of H.P. - Appellant
Versus
Pawan Kumar and Another – Respondent
Cr. Appeal No. 487 of 2011
Decided On : 06-11-2025
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 23.08.2011 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.1, Hamirpur, District Hamirpur (learned Trial Court) vide which the respondents (accused before learned Trial Court) were acquitted for the commission of offences punishable under Section 61 (1) (a) of the Punjab Excise Act as applicable to State of H.P. and Section 182 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (MV Act). (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the police presented a challan before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission of offences punishable under Section 61 (1) (a) of the Punjab Excise Act as applicable to the State of H.P. and Section 182 of the M V Act. It was asserted that SI Raj Kumar (PW9), HC Suresh Kumar (PW1), HHC Joginder Singh (PW7), and Constable Suresh Kumar (PW2) were on patrol in an official vehicle being driven by HHC Ram Saran at Dehriyan on the intervening night of 31.03.2007 and 01.04.2007. A jeep bearing registration no. HP-67-0372 came on a high speed from Sujanpur at 01:25 am. The police signalled the driver to stop. The driver identified himself as Pawan Kumar, and the person sitting beside the driver identified himself as Lekh Raj. The vehicle was covered with the tarpaulin, which was got removed and cartons containing liquor bottles were found in the vehicle. SI Raj Kumar demanded a permit/license for transporting the liquor, but the accused could not produce any document. The place was lonely and deserted; hence, no independent witness could be associated. The cardboard boxes were checked, and they were found to be 130 in number. 120 boxes contained 12 bottles of country liquor each bearing the mark Una No. 1, and 10 boxes contained 12 bottles of country liquor each bearing the mark Lal Quila. Thus, the police recovered 1440 bottles of country liquor bearing the mark Una no. 1 and 120 bottles of country liquor bearing the mark Lal Quila. One bottle each was taken out as a sample from 6 boxes of Una No. 1, and one bottle each was taken out as a sample from 3 boxes of Lal Quila. Each bottle was sealed with a seal ‘R’. Seal impression (Ext.PW9/E) was taken on a separate piece of cloth, and the seal was handed over to HC Suresh Kumar after use. The remaining 1434 bottles of Una No. 1 and 117 bottles of Lal Quila, vehicle bearing registration no. HP-67-0372 and the samples were seized vide memo (Ext. PW1/A). Copies of seizure memos were supplied to each of the accused. Rukka (Ext.PW9/A) was prepared and was sent to the Police Station, where FIR (Ext.PW8/A) was registered. SI Raj Kumar investigated the matter. He prepared the site plan (Ext. PW9/B) and recorded the statements of witnesses as per their version. He deposited the case property with MHC Ranjit Singh (PW6), who deposited it in Maalkhana and made an entry in the malkhana register (Ex. PW6/D). He sent the sample bottles to CTL Kandaghat for analysis vide R.C. 5/2007 (Ext.PW6/C) through HHC Roop Lal (PW3), who deposited the bottles in the CTL Kandaghat and handed over the receipt to MHC on his return. The results of the analysis (Ext.PW6/A and Ext. PW6/B) were issued, stating that samples contained 50.0% proof alcohol each, and they were fit for human consumption. The documents of the vehicle were seized vide memo (Ext.PW4/A). After the completion of the investigation, the challan was prepared and presented before the learned Trial Court.
3. Learned Trial Court found sufficient reasons to summon the accused. When the accused appeared, the accused Pawan Kumar was charged with the commission of offences punishable under Section 61 (1) (a) of the Punjab Excise Act, and Section 182 of MV Act and the accused Lekh Raj was charged with the commission of an offence punishable under Section 61 (1) (a) of Punjab Ex
The appellate court must respect acquittals unless evidence shows the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
In appeals against acquittal under NDPS Act, interference justified only if trial court's view perverse or based on misreading evidence; material contradictions in recovery witnesses and lack of inde....
An appellate court must exercise caution in overriding a trial court's acquittal; substantial contradictions in witness testimonies and integrity of evidence undermine prosecution's case.
An appellate court reviewing an acquittal must respect the presumption of innocence unless the judgment is perverse or misreads evidence, supporting the lower court's decision.
In appeals against acquittal, the appellate court must respect the presumption of innocence and only intervene when the trial court's findings demonstrate clear legal error or perverse reasoning.
Appeal against acquittal in illicit liquor possession upheld where search non-compliant with CrPC Section 165, independent witnesses hostile, case property integrity doubted, and trial court's reason....
The prosecution's failure to produce key evidence, including case property and corroborating witness testimonies, justified the appellate court's acquittal of the accused.
Acquittal in excess liquor possession case set aside as perverse; no need for independent witnesses in patrolling chance recovery or independent seal custody; reliable police evidence suffices; convi....
High Court upheld acquittal in illicit liquor case refusing state appeal interference, as first appellate court's view on contradictions in official testimonies, raiding party suspicion, seal discrep....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.