IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
State of H.P. – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Bharti Rana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 12.10.2012 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.1, Dehra, District Kangra (learned Trial Court) vide which the respondent (accused before learned Trial Court) was acquitted of the commission of an offence punishable under Section 61 (1) (a) of the Punjab Excise Act as applicable to State of H.P. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience).
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the police presented a challan before the learned Trial Court against the accused for the commission of an offence punishable under Section 61 (1) (a) of the Punjab Excise Act as applicable to the State of H.P. and Section 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act (MV Act). It was asserted that SI/SHO Som Nath (PW5), ASI Chain Singh, ASI Sanjay Kumar, Constable Ashok Kumar, HHG Pradeep Kumar, HHG Dilbag and HHG Lekh Raj were on nakabandi in an official vehicle bearing registration No. HP39A-0459 on 25.09.2008 at 3:00 am. Two vehicles came at a high speed from Dehra at about 6:45 am. The police si
An appellate court reviewing an acquittal must respect the presumption of innocence unless the judgment is perverse or misreads evidence, supporting the lower court's decision.
Appeal against acquittal in illicit liquor possession upheld where search non-compliant with CrPC Section 165, independent witnesses hostile, case property integrity doubted, and trial court's reason....
The prosecution's failure to produce key evidence, including case property and corroborating witness testimonies, justified the appellate court's acquittal of the accused.
The appellate court must respect acquittals unless evidence shows the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
High Court upheld acquittal in illicit liquor case refusing state appeal interference, as first appellate court's view on contradictions in official testimonies, raiding party suspicion, seal discrep....
High Court upholds acquittal in illicit liquor case due to procedural search lapse by woman, hostile independent witness, and non-production of case property; interference in acquittal only if perver....
Acquittal in excess liquor possession case set aside as perverse; no need for independent witnesses in patrolling chance recovery or independent seal custody; reliable police evidence suffices; convi....
Appeal against acquittal under NDPS Act dismissed; trial court's view upheld as not perverse due to witness contradictions, procedural lapses like unrecorded prior information, no independent witness....
Appeal against acquittal in NDPS case dismissed as trial court view not perverse; independent witnesses resiling from driver identification and lack of possession link creates reasonable doubt justif....
The appellate court affirmed that a trial court's acquittal may not be disturbed unless it is found to suffer from patent perversity or misreading of evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.