IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
Ashok Kumar and Others – Appellants
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh and Others – Respondents
CWP No. 6947 of 2022
Decided On : 07-11-2025
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP SHARMA, J.
1. Through instant petition, challenge has been laid to order dated 04.07.2022 passed by Commissioner Temple Chintpurni-cum-Deputy Commissioner, Una, District Una, Himachal Pradesh, whereby representation having been filed by the petitioners for regularization, in terms of order dated 06.05.2022 passed by Division Bench of this Court in Review Petition No. 137 of 2021, titled as Ashok Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. came to be rejected.
2. Precisely, the facts of the case, as emerge from the pleadings adduced on record by the petitioners are that petitioners have been serving in Mata Chintpurni Temple as Langar Sevadars, Mandir Sevadars and Electricians for the last 15 to 16 years, but yet their request for regularization was not considered on one pretext or the other. Though representations made by the petitioners were forwarded to office of Commissioner (Temple), Chintpurni by the Temple Officer, but since no action was taken upon the same, petitioners filed CWP No.3925 of 2019, which was dismissed, vide judgment dated 22.09.2021 (Annexure P-3) on the premise that services of a Sevadar are gratuitous in nature. Though petitioners filed Review Petition No.137 of 2021, but same was dismissed. However, Division Bench of this Court permitted petitioners to file representation for redressal of their grievance with a direction to the respondents to decide the same, uninfluenced by the earlier order(s), more particularly, the order passed in CWP No.3925 of 2019.
3. In the afore background, petitioners submitted a representation dated 11.05.2022 to the Deputy Commissioner-cum- Commissioner, Mata Shree Chintpurni-Temple Trust, Una, District Una, Himachal Pradesh (Annexure P-4), but the afore authority, vide impugned order dated 04.07.2022, rejected the same on the ground that petitioners were neither temporary nor casual employees, as such, their prayer for regularization cannot be accepted. In the afore background, petitioners have approached this Court in the instant proceedings, praying therein for the following main reliefs:-
“i. That impugned orders (Annexure P-8) being bad in law may very kindly be quashed and set aside with directions to the respondents to immediately and forthwith engage the petitioners as Sevadars in the Trust and regularize their services with all consequential benefits of pay, seniority etc.
ii. Respondents may very kindly be directed to regularize the services of the petitioners on their having completed 8 years of regular service with 240 days in every calendar year from the date of completion of the same or in any eventuality, in the alternative it is submitted that respondents may very kindly be directed to do the same with effect from 2019, when petitioners filed Writ Petition.”
4. Pursuant to notices issued in the instant proceedings, respondents No.1 to 5 have filed reply under the signatures of Temple Officer, Chintpurni, District Una, Himachal Pradesh, wherein an attempt has been made to refute the claim of the petitioners on the ground that petitioners have not approached this Court with clean hands, as such, writ petition is barred by principle of suppressio veri and suggestio falsi. It has been further averred in the reply that none of the petitioners was working in the Temple Trust-Mata Shri Chintpurni nor they have been engaged by Temple Officer, Mata Shri Chintpurni Trust, District Una, which fact is otherwise evident from the averments contained in the petition as well as documents adduced on record by the petitioners.
5. By way of filing rejoinder to the reply filed by respondents No.1 to 5, petitioners have reiterated that for the last 15 to 16 years, they have been working at Mata Chintpurni Temple as Langar Sevadars, Mandir Sevadars and Electricians. To substantiate their afore claim, they have placed on record certain documents received by them under Right to Information Act suggestive of the fact that they were assigned duties of various works
Regularization of employment requires clear evidence of employer-employee relationships, adherence to constitutional provisions, and formal appointment processes.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to direct the regularization of the petitioner's service based on qualifications, recommendations, and previous rulings, desp....
Prolonged service of over ten years without legal hindrance can qualify employees for regularization, regardless of the initial nature of their appointments.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.