Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA
Tarsem Pathania – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute on compassionate eligibility due to elder brother's prior family separation and service. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. direct state to consider and grant petitioner's compassionate appointment promptly. (Para 5 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. compassionate policy aids indigent families; barred if family member already employed. (Para 6) |
| 4. policy 'family' term subservient to act recognizing brother's separate status pre-death. (Para 7) |
| 5. state's prolonged delay in compassionate consideration arbitrary, must act timely. (Para 8) |
| 6. no delay bar when state inaction keeps eligible claim pending. (Para 9) |
Judgment :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Petitioner, Tarsem Pathania, has initially filed OA No.6432 of 2017, which upon abolition of State Administrative Tribunal stands transferred to this Court, as CWPOA No. 3263 of 2020, seeking the following relief:-
“7(i) That the respondents may be directed to give employment to the applicant on compassionate grounds immediately and with retrospective date.”
FACTUAL MATRIX:
2. Grievance of the petitioner is that his father died during service as Deputy Ranger on 30.08.2007. Petitioner, being the dependent applied for compassionate appointment but since no ac
Compassionate policy's 'family' interpreted per Panchayati Raj law; prior Gram Sabha-recognized separation via Parivar Register excludes employed sibling from joint family, rendering employment bar i....
The need for immediacy in providing compassionate appointment and disentitling relief due to undue delay.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for strict construction of the policy for compassionate appointment and the inability to alter the policy through judicial intervention.
Compassionate appointment is an exception, not a right, intended for immediate relief to families in financial crisis following the death of a breadwinner, and delays in application undermine this pu....
Compassionate appointment cannot be claimed as a matter of right but must be decided reasonably and without unnecessary delay to avoid discrimination and uphold fairness.
Compassionate appointments must be made promptly following a breadwinner's death; delayed applications undermine their purpose.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
