IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
Daleep Kumar Thakur - Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. And Another - Respondents.
CWP No. 8824 of 2023
Decided On : 18-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's service history and indira gandhi nss national award receipt. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. 2015 notification supersedes priors; 2-year extension for national awardees. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents argue nss award excluded from 2015 notification scope. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT :
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.
Petitioner retired as Principal from respondents- Education Department. His case is that on account of having received a National Award, respondents were bound to grant him two years extension in service and one additional increment as per notification dated 24.09.2015. Respondents have not accepted petitioner’s contention. According to them, the National award received by the petitioner does not fall within the purview of the said notification, hence, he was justly not granted extension in service as also the additional increment.
2. The case.
2(i) Petitioner was appointed as Lecturer (History) School Cadre on 07.12.1995. He was promoted to the post of Principal on 15.04.2017. While serving as Lecturer, petitioner was deputed by respondents as Incharge of National Service Scheme (NSS) in the Department of Higher Education in July, 2002. Taking note of petitioner’s contribution to NSS as Programme Co-ordinator, the Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports, Government of India recommended his name for Indira Gandhi N.S.S. Award (IGNSS), 2011-12. The award was received by the petitioner from Hon’ble President of India on 26.10.2012.
Alongwith National Award, the petitioner also received cash prize of Rs.50,000/- and a trophy. 50,000/- and a trophy.
2(ii) Respondents- Education Department came up with notification dated 24.09.2015 (Annexure A-3), its English translation as supplied by learned counsel for the petitioner reads as under:-
“Government of Himachal Pradesh
Elementary Education Department
D.N.C.C. (1-7)-3/ 2007 Volume-III Dated Shimla-2 24.9.2015
Notification
In supersession of all previous notifications/orders, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh grants two years extension in service with one additional increment to teachers who have received national level awards and one year extension of service to teachers who have received state level awards.
This decision will come into effect from the date of issue of the notification.
By order
Additional Chief Secretary (Education)
Government of Himachal Pradesh”
The above notification was issued in supercession of all previous notifications/orders/decision on the subject. As per above notification, Hon’ble Governor of Himachal Pradesh had approved extension in service by two years to the National Awardee teachers alongwith one additional increment. The State Awardee teachers were entitled to one year extension in service.
2(iii) Subsequently another notification was issued on 30.11.2015 clarifying that to get extension in service the eligible teachers will have the option to deposit the cash awards. Incidentally, petitioner deposited cash award which he had received alongwith the National Award, with the respondents. Petitioner was due to superannuate on 31.05.2023. He represented seeking extension of two years in service. Staking claim upon the applicability of notification dated 24.09.2015, petitioner has preferred this writ petition for grant of following substantive relief:-
“i) That a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order of direction may kindly be issued to directing the respondents to grant the petitioner two years extension in service and one additional increment in terms of notification dated 24.09.2015 (Annexure P-3).”
2(iv) The respondents- Education Department in its reply has not denied that petitioner had been given National Award. According to the respondents, the said National Award conferred upon the petitioner i.e. IGNSS Award for the period 2011-12 is not covered under the notification dated 24.09.2015.
Respondents in their reply have made an endevour to trace history of notifications/scheme for conferring awards to teachers in the State Education Department

Notification superseding priors grants two-year service extension and increment to all national awardee teachers without distinguishing award fields like education or NSS; artificial exclusion invali....
The right to extension in service for National Award recipients cannot be negated by subsequent policy changes if it was accrued under prior notifications.
Extension is granted to an employee who is in service. No extension can be after retirement.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the rule of harmonious construction in interpreting conflicting provisions of the Government Order and determining the entitleme....
Point of Law : A Government servant has no right to continue in service beyond the age of superannuation and if he is retained beyond that age it is only in the exercise of the discretion of the Gove....
The eligibility for the teacher award is determined based on the date of application, not the date of the Selection Committee's consideration.
A Para Teacher improperly denied benefits under governmental notifications due to administrative delays retains rights entitled under these notifications.
The court established that once a teacher has reached the age of superannuation, any extension of service must be explicitly provided by law, and the provisions of the UP Intermediate Education Act, ....
The court established that the deletion of the advance increment provision in the Government Circular was valid and did not apply retrospectively to teachers not awarded before the change.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.