SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1539

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
Daleep Kumar Thakur - Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. And Another - Respondents.
CWP No. 8824 of 2023
Decided On : 18-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Onkar Jairath, Mr. Piyush, Mehta, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. L.N.Sharma, Additional Advocate General.

Notification superseding priors grants two-year service extension and increment to all national awardee teachers without distinguishing award fields like education or NSS; artificial exclusion invalid; actual post-retirement monetary benefits due despite no work.

Headnote:(A) Notification dated 24.09.2015 - Extension of service to national awardee teachers - Two years extension with one additional increment - Scope - Covers all national awards received by teachers from Government of India and conferred by President, irrespective of field (education excellence or NSS contribution), as notification supersedes all previous notifications/orders without distinguishing types of awards - Artificial discrimination between awards unwarranted - Recipient entitled to benefits. (Para 4)

(B) Service jurisprudence - Post-retirement claims - Wrongful denial of extension benefits - Employee willing but not permitted to work through no fault - ‘No work no pay’ principle inapplicable - Entitled to actual monetary benefits for extended period, adjustable against pension. (Para 4)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner, retired as Principal, appointed as lecturer in 1995, promoted in 2017, deputed as NSS Programme Co-ordinator in 2002, received national award in 2011-12 with cash prize and trophy, deposited cash, due to retire on 31.05.2023, sought two years extension and increment per notification dated 24.09.2015, denied on ground that NSS award not covered as distinct from education award under prior scheme.

Findings of Court:
Petitioner entitled to emoluments for two years extended service from 01.06.2023 to 31.05.2025, actual payable after adjusting pension paid for period, to be completed within six weeks.

Issues: Whether national NSS award falls within purview of notification dated 24.09.2015 for service extension benefits; applicability of ‘no work no pay’ to post-retirement monetary claims.

Ratio Decidendi: Notification dated 24.09.2015 governs field exclusively post-supersession, requires only conferment of national award on teacher without field-specific dissection; distinction between education and NSS awards artificial as both recognize teacher contributions, NSS integral to curriculum; precedents affirm actual benefits where denial faultless.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's service history and indira gandhi nss national award receipt. (Para 1 , 2)
2. 2015 notification supersedes priors; 2-year extension for national awardees. (Para 3)
3. respondents argue nss award excluded from 2015 notification scope. (Para 5)

JUDGMENT :

Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J.

Petitioner retired as Principal from respondents- Education Department. His case is that on account of having received a National Award, respondents were bound to grant him two years extension in service and one additional increment as per notification dated 24.09.2015. Respondents have not accepted petitioner’s contention. According to them, the National award received by the petitioner does not fall within the purview of the said notification, hence, he was justly not granted extension in service as also the additional increment.

2. The case.

2(i) Petitioner was appointed as Lecturer (History) School Cadre on 07.12.1995. He was promoted to the post of Principal on 15.04.2017. While serving as Lecturer, petitioner was deputed by respondents as Incharge of National Service Scheme (NSS) in the Department of Higher Education in July, 2002. Taking note of petitioner’s contribution to NSS as Programme Co-ordinator, the Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports, Government of India recommended his name for Indira Gandhi N.S.S. Award (IGNSS), 2011-12. The award was received by the petitioner from Hon’ble President of India on 26.10.2012.

Alongwith National Award, the petitioner also received cash prize of Rs.50,000/- and a trophy. 50,000/- and a trophy.

2(ii) Respondents- Education Department came up with notification dated 24.09.2015 (Annexure A-3), its English translation as supplied by learned counsel for the petitioner reads as under:-

“Government of Himachal Pradesh

Elementary Education Department

D.N.C.C. (1-7)-3/ 2007 Volume-III Dated Shimla-2 24.9.2015

Notification

In supersession of all previous notifications/orders, the Governor of Himachal Pradesh grants two years extension in service with one additional increment to teachers who have received national level awards and one year extension of service to teachers who have received state level awards.

This decision will come into effect from the date of issue of the notification.

By order
Additional Chief Secretary (Education)
Government of Himachal Pradesh”

The above notification was issued in supercession of all previous notifications/orders/decision on the subject. As per above notification, Hon’ble Governor of Himachal Pradesh had approved extension in service by two years to the National Awardee teachers alongwith one additional increment. The State Awardee teachers were entitled to one year extension in service.

2(iii) Subsequently another notification was issued on 30.11.2015 clarifying that to get extension in service the eligible teachers will have the option to deposit the cash awards. Incidentally, petitioner deposited cash award which he had received alongwith the National Award, with the respondents. Petitioner was due to superannuate on 31.05.2023. He represented seeking extension of two years in service. Staking claim upon the applicability of notification dated 24.09.2015, petitioner has preferred this writ petition for grant of following substantive relief:-

“i) That a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order of direction may kindly be issued to directing the respondents to grant the petitioner two years extension in service and one additional increment in terms of notification dated 24.09.2015 (Annexure P-3).”

2(iv) The respondents- Education Department in its reply has not denied that petitioner had been given National Award. According to the respondents, the said National Award conferred upon the petitioner i.e. IGNSS Award for the period 2011-12 is not covered under the notification dated 24.09.2015.

Respondents in their reply have made an endevour to trace history of notifications/scheme for conferring awards to teachers in the State Education Department




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top