SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, VIKAS BUDHWAR
Hariom Sharan Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Surya Prakash Kesarwani, Vikas Budhwar, JJ.
1. Present intra-court appeal, purported to be under Chapter 8 Rule 5 of the Rules of the High Court 1952, has been instituted by the appellant challenging the valildity and the correctness of the judgment and order dated 20.10.2010 passed by the learned Single Judge in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 62959 of 2010, Hariom Sharan Srivastava Vs. State of U.P. and others.
2. Though the present appeal was filed with delay condonation application, and the delay was condoned by virtue of the order dated 28.8.2012. Today, when the matter came up before this Court, then the learned counsel for the appellant as well as the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Respondent nos.1 to 5 requested the Court to decide the present appeal at the admission stage itself. Though, notices were issued to Respondent no.6, but no response has been filed by it. Hence in the circumstances, this Court is proceeding to decide the appeal on the basis of the material available on record.
3. Heard Sri Siddhartha Srivastava holding brief of Sri Yogish Kumar Saxena, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Shubhra Singh, learned counsel for the State respond
State Of Assam & Ors vs Padma Ram Borah
R. T. Rangachari v. Secretary of State 64 Ind App 40 : 1937 AIR(PC) 27
State of Assam and Ors. v. Padma Ram Borah
R.T. Rangachari v. Secretary of the State
State of Assam and others vs. Basanta Kumar Das
State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur and others Vs. Jag Mohan Lal reported in AIR 1989 SC 75
P. Venugopal vs. Union of India
State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur and Ors. vs. Jag Mohan Lal (AIR 1989 SC 75)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.