SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(HP) 1607

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
VIRENDER SINGH, J.
Moti Sharma - Applicant
Versus
State of H.P. – Respondent
Cr. MP(M) No. 2721 of 2025
Decided On : 28-11-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicant :Mr. T.K. Verma, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Mohinder Zharaick, Mr. H.S. Rawat and Mr. Varun Chandel, Addl. A.Gs. with Ms. Ranjna Patial and Mr. Rohit Sharma, Dy. A.Gs, assisted by LHC Rekha No. 113, Police Station, West, Shimjla, H.P.

Bail under NDPS Section 37 requires court satisfaction beyond prima facie that accused is not guilty and will not commit offence on bail; concealment of prior NDPS cases justifies rejection.

Headnote:(A) NDPS Act - Sections 21, 27-A and 29 - Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita - Section 483 - Bail application during trial pendency - Recovery of 23.72 grams contraband claimed not commercial quantity - Addition of Sections 27-A and 29 attracting rigors of Section 37 - Applicant must satisfy twin conditions of not being guilty and not committing offence on bail - No such satisfaction recorded, more than prima facie required - Three prior NDPS cases concealed in application. (Paras 2, 9-14)

(B) NDPS Act - Section 37 - Bail satisfaction - Must be sine qua non more than prima facie finding - Applicant bound to disclose all material facts for just adjudication - Custodial interrogation no longer required claimed, but larger network revealed through admissions and financial trails. (Paras 3, 10-13)

Facts of the case:
Secret information led to raid, recovery of contraband from room pillow where applicant staying, weighing 23.72 grams identified as heroin. Applicant admitted sourcing from adjoining state, addiction since 2011, involvement in supply chain with financial transactions via intermediaries' accounts, multiple communications. Investigation complete with samples sent, witnesses examined, other accused arrested.

Findings of Court:
No basis to hold twin conditions satisfied; antecedents concealed; applicant not entitled to bail.

Issues: Applicability of Section 37 rigors due to added charges; satisfaction of twin conditions; impact of non-disclosure of prior cases and network involvement.

Ratio Decidendi: Presence of Section 27-A mandates strict Section 37 compliance with satisfaction beyond prima facie of innocence and non-recidivism; full disclosure of material facts including antecedents essential.

Result: Bail application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. applicant claims innocence, non-commercial quantity for bail. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. raid uncovers heroin, disclosures reveal supply chain conspiracy. (Para 7)
3. sections 27-a, 29 added for financing and abetment. (Para 8)
4. section 37 twin conditions require prima facie innocence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
5. concealed antecedents bar bail grant. (Para 13 , 14)
6. bail dismissed; observations not on merits. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT :

Virender Singh, J.

Applicant Moti Sharma has filed the present application, under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as ‘the BNSS’) for releasing him, on bail, during the pendency of the trial, arising out of FIR No. 64 of 2025, dated 10.4.2025, registered under Sections 21, 27-A and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘NDPS’ Act), with Police Station, Boileauganj, District Shimla, H.P.

2. The applicant has pleaded the fact that he is innocent person and has falsely been implicated, in the present case and the contraband, which is stated to be 23.72 grams, does not fall within the definition of ‘commercial quantity’. As such, according to the applicant, rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act are not applicable in the present case.

3. According to the applicant, investigation, in the present case, is complete and nothing is to be recovered, from his possession. All these facts have been pleaded to show that custodial interrogation of the applicant is no longer required by the Police.

4. Applicant has pleaded that he belongs to a respectable family and having deep roots in the society.

5. On the basis of above facts, the applicant, through his counsel, has undertaken to abide by the terms and conditions, to be imposed by this Court, in case, he is ordered to be released on bail, during pendency of the trial.

6. On these submissions, a prayer has been made to allow the bail application.

7. When put to notice, the police has filed the status report, disclosing therein, that on 10.4.2025, H.C. Puneet Sharma No. 54, I.O., SIU, Shimla has submitted a ruqua, disclosing therein that on 10.4.2025, he alongwith other police officials, under the leadership of ASI Sushil Kumar, was on patrolling duty, towards ISBT Shimla, Tutikandi and Sankat Mochan. When, he was at ISBT Shimla, then, he received a secret information from the reliable sources that in the house of Shiv Singh Thakur, in village Tikkar, in the room of one Mamta, applicant Moti Sharma was staying and has brought large quantity of contraband, from the adjoining state and selling the same to the customers. As per the information, if the said room is searched, then, a large quantity of heroin/chitta could be recovered from applicant Moti Sharma.

7.1 The said information was found to be authentic and reliable. As per the Police, in the eventuality of obtaining the search warrant, delay could occur and contraband could be removed from there. The said information was found to be reliable, as such, he has complied with the provisions of Section 42(2) of the NDPS Act, and submitted the same to the Supervisory Officer.
7.2 Thereafter, a request was made to Police Station to depute one Lady Constable by sending her to ISBT, Shimla, upon which, Lady Const. Saroj No. 1592 reached at the spot, who was associated in the team. Thereafter, the police team proceeded towards the spot and at about 12:00 at noon, they reached at village Tikkar. In the said village, one person was there in the carpenter shop, to which, the I.O. has given his personal identification and apprised him about the secret information. Thereafter, owner of the house Shiv Singh Thakur was called to the spot. Said Shiv Singh Thakur reached at the spot and he was associated in the investigation.
7.3 Apart from this, one Jagat Pal Singh was also associated in the investigation. Alongwith the police team and independent witnesses, the I.O. reached at the second floor of the house of Shiv Singh Tha










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top