IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RANJAN SHARMA
Sunita Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. state denies status absent work-charge establishment post-regularization. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Petitioner, Sunita Kumari and two others initially filed O.A. No.3333 of 2016, before Learned State Administrative Tribunal; and upon of the Tribunal, the matter has been transferred to CWPOA No.7896 of 2019 seeking the following relief(s):
“(i). That the orders dated 23.11.2015 Annexure A-2, A-2, A-2b may kindly be quashed and set aside and the respondents may kindly be directed to regularize the services of the applicants and give them work-charge status after 8 years of daily waged services as per the judgment delivered in CWP No.2735 of 2010 titled as Rakesh Kumar versus State of H.P.”
FACTUAL MATRIX:
2. Grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners were engaged as daily wagers in the Forest Department in 1994 and their services were regularized on 08.09.2007 on completion of 08 years of daily wage services as per the policy.
2(i). It is averred that Petitioner No.1, Sunita Kumari and Petitioner No.2-Vinod Kumar have rendered continuous service with 240 days from 1995 till 2006 as per Annexure A-2 and Annexure A-2a. Likewise, the Petitioner No.2-Vin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.