Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Girja Nand Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. trial acquitted accused of assault on public servant; appellate reversed under section 353 ipc. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner claims appellate ignored delay, contradictions; state defends evidence reappreciation. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. appeal against acquittal requires perversity, material evidence omission for interference. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. unexplained fir delay invites embellishment, demands cautious prosecution scrutiny. (Para 15 , 17) |
| 5. pw3 denies incident; pw4 fails to prove criminal force under section 353. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. witness contradictions, defective one-sided investigation justify doubting prosecution case. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. appellate reversal unsustainable; restore trial acquittal with bail directions. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, Judge
The present revision is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 12.04.2013 and order of sentence dated 16.04.2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Shimla (learned Appellate Court) vide which the judgment dated 18.12.2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court No.1, Shimla, District Shimla (learned Trial Court) was s
Appellate reversal of acquittal unsustainable unless trial judgment perverse, ignores evidence, or no reasonable acquittal view possible; unexplained FIR delay, witness contradictions justify caution....
Appellate court should not interfere with reasonable acquittal view despite alternate possibility, factoring FIR delay, night identification doubts, intoxication-enabled fall injuries, strained relat....
Appellate interference with acquittal justified only if perverse, ignores material evidence, or no reasonable innocence view possible; here upheld due to contradictions, delay, defence credibility.
Appellate interference in acquittal appeals limited to perverse judgments ignoring evidence where only guilt view possible; unexplained FIR delay, unreliable interested witnesses justify upholding tr....
Appellate interference in acquittal appeals limited to perverse findings or sole guilt view; unexplained FIR delay, testimony contradictions, enmity motive, non-corroborative medicals, and SC/ST inve....
In appeal against acquittal lacking reasons, re-appreciation permissible; no interference if Trial Court view sustainable despite evidentiary infirmities like hostile witnesses, FIR delay and absent ....
High Court will not interfere with acquittal unless patently perverse or ignores material evidence; unexplained FIR delay, testimonial contradictions, absent medical corroboration, and inadmissible s....
In appeals against acquittal, interference only if perverse or no reasonable view supports acquittal; unexplained FIR delay, material improvements in victim's testimony, and lack of corroboration jus....
Appellate courts interfere with acquittal only if patently perverse or ignoring material evidence; trial court's reasonable view, considering double presumption of innocence, not disturbed despite co....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
