SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(J&K) 696

Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Chief Engineer – Appellant
Versus
State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.A. Chashoo, Shubnum Lone.

1. Petitioners have questioned order dated 25.06.2009 passed by State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Srinagar-respondent No. 1 in appeal No. 27/2008 as well as award dated 14.06.2008 passed by Divisional Consumer Protection Forum, Srinagar in File No. 396/2007, Srinagar, on the grounds taken in the writ petition.

2. It appears that complainant-respondent No. 2 herein filed a complaint before the Divisional Consumer Forum for redressal of his grievances. Non-applicants-writ petitioners herein appeared and filed objections, thereafter had chosen to remain absent and accordingly exparte proceedings were drawn against the petitioner-department and exparte order came to be passed by the Divisional Consumer Forum on 14.06.2008 against them. Feeling aggrieved the petitioner-department filed appeal before respondent No. 1, was dismissed vide judgment and order dated 25.6.2009. Feeling aggrieved the petitioners herein have sought quashment of both the orders passed by the Divisional Consumer Forum as well as respondent No. 1.

3. Precisely the case of complainant-respondent No. 2 herein was that a water connection was provided to him by the petitioner-department under No. 4313/64 abou





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top