SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(J&K) 489

HASNAIN MASSODI
Nimrat-Ul-Ain Banday – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :M.A. Qayoom and N.A. Ronga, Advocates
For the Respondents:G.A. Lone, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Hasnain Massodi, J.

1. Facts in petitions on hand are by and large admitted. Controversy is restricted to competence of J&K Board of Professional Entrance Examinations (hereinafter referred to as "Board"), to take decision impugned in writ petitions, mode and manner of decision taken and justification for such decision. Board in April 2014 initiated annual exercise to make selection for Professional Colleges of the State and recommend selected candidates for admission in various Streams in such Colleges, before the specified date. Board on 8th April 2014 issued a Notification informing eligible candidates that Board was likely to issue a Notification inviting applications from aspirants for admission in question. This was in the nature of wake up call, so that candidates would organise their record and get ready to fill up and submit their applications in prescribed format. Admission Notification was issued on 15th April 2014. Petitioners in writ petitions on hand, like other aspirants, submitted their applications as directed in Information Brochure. Board issued Common




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top