Back
Rajeev Mukul – Appellant
Versus
State through Drugs Inspector Zone VI – Respondent
Ali Mohd. Magrey, J.
The batch of these petitions shall be decided together as the point in issue involved in all the petitions is similar; therefore, this order shall govern all.
2. The respondent-Drug Inspector on market checking collected various drugs from different places of different pharmaceutical companies for testing its standard and the collected drugs were found, on testing, not to be of standard quality. Subsequently, the respondent adopted a legal course by filing complaints before the competent courts of jurisdiction. The complaints filed in terms of Section 18 (a) (i), and 27 (d) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, for short Act, were entertained and process issued by the respective courts.
3. On the assumption that the course adopted by the respondents' and the Designate Courts is bad in law, the petitioners in these petitions challenge its legal sanctity. Hence the petitions.
4. To make the controversy a little more vivid a brief case-wise event description is deemed appropriate, thus:-
5. Petitioner in 561-A no. 241/2016 is a partner in Zee Pharmaceuticals and is arrayed as accused in the complaint pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Srinagar, in
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
