SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(J&K) 785

Sonam Dolma – Appellant
Versus
Stanzin Dorjay – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. F.A. Wani, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Z.A. Qureshi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Zuhaib Thakur, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. By this judgment, it is proposed to dispose of the Civil 2nd Appeal filed by the appellants (plaintiffs in the main suit) against the judgment and decree, dated 26.06.2014, of the learned District Judge, Leh and Ladakh, whereby he has upheld the judgment and decree dated 30.04.2014 of the learned Sub Judge, Leh and Ladakh.

2. The background facts of the case in a nutshell are that the appellants/plaintiffs filed a suit against the respondents/defendants, before the trial court, seeking declaration, partition, possession and injunction in respect of land measuring 70 Kanals and 11 Marlas, comprising survey Nos. 591, 4612, 4613, 4619 and 4629 situate at Shenam (Old Leh road).

3. In the suit, the appellants/plaintiffs pleaded that the land in question belonged to Tsewang Rafstan, who was succeeded by Tsewang Nurbo Doi and Sonam Kunzom as his legal heirs. The appellants/plaintiffs, claim to be the daughters and son of Sonam Kunzom, who was related to Tsewang Rafstan, as his daughter. The respondents/defendants, are the grandchildren of Tsewang Nurbo Doi, who was the so







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top