SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 581

SANJAY KUMAR GUPTA
Rano Devi – Appellant
Versus
Ram Lal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P.S. Pawar.
For the Respondent: Mr. J.P. Gandhi.

JUDGMENT :

Caveat No. 3410/2018

Caveat stands discharged.

OWP No. 1603/2018

1. This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 104 of the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir has been filed by the petitioners thereby challenging four different orders of same date i.e. 04.08.2018 passed by the Court of Munsiff Akhnoor in an application of the petitioners under order XVIII Rule 17 CPC in a suit for declaration and injunction titled Ram Lal vs. Rano Devi and others an application for producing additional evidence and also to prove Will in terms of Section 71 of Evidence Act; an application u/s 45, 46 and 47 of the Evidence Act for the signature identification of witness Suraj Ram and application for recalling of the order dated 21.04.2018/ 27.04.2018 passed by the trial court with further directions to recall the said witness.

2. In the petition, it has been stated that by virtue of orders impugned passed by the trial Court a grave miscarriage of justice has been occasioned. The trial Court has not only omitted to invoke the jurisdiction vested in it but also has committed a grave error of law. So the orders impugned passed by the trial Court dated 04.08.2018 de

































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top