M.K.HANJURA
Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din Peer – Appellant
Versus
Mohammad Hamza Lone – Respondent
M.K. Hanjura, J.
The petitions detailed above raise common and akin questions of the facts and the law and have, therefore, been clubbed together for collective decision.
2. In all the petitions, the petitioners are aggrieved of the order dated 30th of December, 2013, passed by the learned Special Mobile Magistrate (Electricity), Unit-III, Pattan, Baramulla, Jammu & Kashmir and have assailed the same on the grounds inter-alia that the deceased Azad Ahmad Lone had not died under mysterious circumstances. He had committed suicide on 23.06.2011, in broad day light, in the absence of the petitioners. When the petitioners came to know about this incident, they informed the authorities of Police Station Sopore about the same on 23.6.2011 itself, as a consequence of which an FIR bearing No. 171/2011, for the commission of an offence under Section 309 RPC was registered in the matter and the investigation of the case was entrusted to the respondent No.3, in the petition bearing No. 46/2014 filed under Section 561-A Cr. PC. The respondent No.3 proceeded on spot, recorded the statements of the witnesses under Section 161 Cr. PC and got the postmortem of the deceased conducted at SDH
Vinay Tiyagi vs. Irshad Ali Alias Deepak and Others
State of Karnataka vs. L. Muniswamy and Others
State of Karnataka vs. M. Devenderappa and Another
Sunder Babu and Others vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Priya Vrat Singh and Others vs. Shyam Ji Sahai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.