SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 786

Surinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Anil Gupta, Mr. Danish Bhat, Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Mr. Gagan Kohli.
For the Respondent: Mr. Danish Bhat.

JUDGMENT :

GITA MITTAL, J.

1. With the consent of all counsels, these three appeals are taken up for consideration.

2. Three appeals being LPA Nos. 160/2018, 174/2018 & 204/2018 have been filed before this court by the appellants, all assailing the order dated 20th August 2018 passed in SWP No. 01/2014. Inasmuch as the challenges premises on the same factual basis and to the same judgment, we are taking up these three appeals together for consideration with the consent of learned counsel for the parties.

3. So far as the factual narration is concerned, the same is noted hereafter:

An Advertisement Notification was published in the Employment News in its edition dated 5-11 May, 2012 inviting applications for 13 posts of Fireman with the break up as:-

Unreserved

07

OBC

03

SC

01

ST

02

4. It is noteworthy to note that out of the 13 posts, one vacancy of Fireman stood reserved for ex-man. The minimum qualification prescribed in the advertisement notification was Matriculation or equivalent. The candidates were also required to possess laid down physical standards. So far








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top