SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(J&K) 964

TASHI RABSTAN
Bakshi Faiz Ahmad – Appellant
Versus
Bakshi Farooq Ahmad – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Altaf Haqani, Advocate
For the Respondents:Sajad A. Mir, Advocate

ORDER :

Tashi Rabstan, J.

1. Instant Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred under and in terms of Section 104 read with Order XLIII of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) against Order 14th March 2018, passed by learned 3rd Additional District Judge, Srinagar (for brevity "court below") on an application for grant of ad interim relief, filed in a Civil Suit titled Bakshi Farooq Ahmad v. Bakshi Faiz Ahmad and another, and for setting aside the same, on the grounds assigned therein.

2. The case set up by appellant is that respondent No. 1 instituted a Suit for declaration, partition, possession with mandatory and permanent injunction against appellant and respondent No. 2 before the court below. An application for grant of ad interim relief, anent the suit, filed by respondent No. 1, has been disposed of by court below vide order dated 14th March 2018. It is this order of which appellant is aggrieved, forcing him to thump at portals of this Court with Appeal on hand.

3. I have heard learned counsel for parties at length and considered the matter.

4. Learned counsel appearing for appellant, while dilating his first limb of arguments, strenuously avers that impugned order is bad in eye

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top