SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(J&K) 222

RAJESH BINDAL
Hanifa Akhter – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ashish Singh Kotwal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mrs. Seema Shekhar, Sr. AAG

ORDER :

1. The petitioner is aggrieved against the Notification No. 05 of 2019 dated 04.09.2019 vide which final Block-wise list providing for reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Women for District Reasi, was notified.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that vide Notice No. 01 of 2019 dated 11.07.2019, the Director, Rural Development Department (for short ‘the Director’) published a draft proposal for reservation for Block Development Council constituencies in every block of Jammu Division. Objections/response was invited from general public within seven days. In the draft proposal, Mahore Constituency was reserved for women. Representation was filed, District Panchayat Officer, Reasi recommended to the Director vide letter dated July 20, 2019 that the Block Mahore seat should be kept reserved for women without any change. Thereafter fresh public notice No. 02 of 2019 was issued on 31.07.2019 inviting objections for draft proposal specifying reservation of various seats of the Block Development Coun

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top