IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
Vinod Chatterji Koul, J.
Mohd. Aslam Batana - Petitioner
Versus
Narcotics Control Bureau Gandhi Nagar, Jammu - Respondent
CrlR no.06 of 2021
Decided On : 11-10-2021
NDPS Act, 1985-Sections 8 & 20 - Possession and recovery of Charas – Rejection of earlier bail application - Meaning of “presumptions - petitioner is sought to be implicated merely on the basis of confessional statements of the accused and there is no other evidence to substantiate the allegations against petitioner - Enquiry under Section 67 is a stage prior to investigation as referred in Section 53 of NDPS Act or the said enquiry is distinct from the enquiry under Section 53-A of NDPS Act which is during the course of investigation of offences.
Finding of the court : Petitioner who is saddled with presumptions as per Section 35, 54 and 66 of NDPS Act would have to discharge such presumptions in the trial as per the provisions of the statute and mandate of the Supreme Court in this regard. From the Charas, seized, and ownership thereof would be seen in juxtaposition to statements of petitioner and other accused/witnesses and contraband/material recovered, then it all would also have material bearing. Therefore, petitioner does not bring home the analogy advanced for getting bail on the basis of Section 67 of NDPS Act only because it is not a case based upon statement under Section 67 of NDPS Act only. Some more layers are present into it- Petitioner has already suffered more than 11 months of incarceration which amounts to pretrial detention - complaint under Sections 36-A of NDPS Act has already been filed by the respondent in which many witnesses are official witnesses (Government employees), therefore, cumulatively chance of tampering with witnesses/evidence is remote.
Result : Petition allowed
JUDGEMENT :
1. This revision petition has been filed against the Order dated 22nd February 2021, passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Jammu (for short “Trial Court”) dismissing the bail application, bearing File No.1171/BA titled Mohd. Aslam Batana v. Narcotics Bureau Gandhi Nagar, Jammu, and for setting aside the same, with a further prayer to grant bail in favour of petitioner.
2. The case set up by petitioner in the instant petition is that petitioner was allegedly arrested on 22nd November 2020 from Nagrota Toll Post when he was coming from Srinagar to Jammu along with his family in his own vehicle. He was whisked away to police station Nagrota in the first instance and thereafter to the office of Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) and implicated by respondent in some false and frivolous case, bearing Crime no.02/2019 dated 24th March 2019 for commission of offences punishable under Sections 8 & 20 NDPS Act, 1985, whereas petitioner is neither involved in any such offence nor is he connected with alleged offenders. An application for grant of bail is stated to have been filed by petitioner on 28th November 2020 before the Trial Court, which has been rejected vide order dated 22nd February 2021.
3. Objections have been filed by respondents, in which they submit that secret information was received from reliable sources on 24th March 2019 at 1500 hours that two persons, namely, Bashir Ahmad Khan and Showkat Ahmad Dar, were carrying huge quantity of narcotic drugs, i.e., Charas, in a car Toyota Corolla bearing Registration No.DL7CG-1566, from Kashmir Valley and reaching Jammu via Ban Toll Plaza, Nagrota, Jammu. After statutory and procedural compliance, the NCB team reached in front of Ban Toll Plaza Nagrota, Jammu, at about 1830 hours, and started watching vehicles coming from Srinagar side towards Jammu for arrival of abovementioned vehicle. At about 2015 hours, the NCB noticed the above car and immediately indicated the said car to stop. On asking the person seated on driver seat, disclosed his identity as Showkat Ahmad Dar and other person sitting in the front seat of the said car disclosed his name as Bashir Ahmad Khan. On search of car, a false cavity behind the back seat of the said car was found and on opening the said cavity through screw, 35 packets were recovered. Out of 35 packets, 16 packets were wrapped with white colour cello tape having marking 22.22 and 19 packets were wrapped with brown colour cello tape (04 packets having marketing APPLE & 15 packets having marking 777). On further inquiry from accused, Bashir Ahmad Khan and Showkat Ahmad Dar, they disclosed that all 35 packets were containing Charas and on testing with Narcotics Drugs, detection kit by NCB officers, it was confirmed to be Charas, NCB officer further weighed all contraband with weighing machine and its total weight came to 36 kgs including packing material. It is stated that based on evidence and voluntary and confessional statement given on 25th March 2019, by Bashir Ahmad Khan and Showkat Ahmad Dar, in which they, inter alia, admitted their guilt of being found in conscious possession and recovery of Charas, a narcotics drugs contravening Section 8 of NDPS Act 1985 and the accused were, accordingly, arrested at 0950 hours and 1215 hours on 25th March 2019 under Section 8, 20, 60 NDPS Act. The chemical analysis report from Chemical Examiner Grade II of Central Revenues Control Laboratory, New Delhi, vide their test report was received, which was confirmed for positive result of Charas in the drawn samples. During investigation, accused, Bashir Ahmad Khan, accepted that seized drug was given by petitioner, Mohd Aslam Batana, whereupon I.O. issued summons to petitioner, but he tried to escape and did not cooperate in the investigation of the case. It is also contended analysis of customer Application Form (CAF) of petitioner, it has come to notice that the mobile number used was in the name of Nasreena Begum F/H Fazal Rehman R/o Sogam, Kupwara,
Point of Law : NDPS Act – Search and seizer of charas – Grant of Bail - Petitioner has already suffered more than 11 months of incarceration which amounts to pretrial detention.
In NDPS commercial quantity cases, bail requires court satisfaction of twin conditions under Section 37: reasonable grounds accused not guilty and unlikely to reoffend; co-accused confessional statem....
The admissibility of evidence, including confessional statements, and the application of Section 37 of the NDPS Act for bail, were central legal points established in the judgment.
The need for substantial probable causes for believing that the accused is not guilty of the alleged offence and the deleterious impact of narcotic drugs on society.
Vehicle occupants prima facie in conscious possession of commercial quantity contraband absent explanation; bail refused as twin conditions under Section 37 not satisfied: no reasonable grounds for b....
Bail denied in NDPS commercial quantity case as accused failed twin conditions of Section 37: no reasonable grounds to believe not guilty given prima facie conscious possession via concealment attemp....
The court established that for charges under the NDPS Act, corroborative evidence is essential to substantiate claims of abetment or conspiracy.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.