SINDHU SHARMA
Mohd Latief – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of J&K – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sindhu Sharma, J.-In both the petitions, the controversy involved is similar, as such, these are taken up together for consideration and disposal by this common judgment.
2. The petitioners in WP(C) No. 1887/2021, are the elected Sarpanches of District Rajouri and they are aggrieved of e-NIT No. 42 REW Rajouri of 2021 dated 02.09.2021 vide which e-tenders have been invited for execution of works at various Panchayats on the ground that the same are in violation of the Jammu and Kashmir Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996.
3. The petitioners in WP(C) No. 2045/2021 are unemployed youths of Village Ganika, Tehsil Bhagwah, Distirct Doda and theyare also aggrieved of e-tenders i.e., e-NIT No. 15/capex of REW Doda 2021-22 dated 08.09.2021 and e-NIT No. 02/capex of REW Doda 2021-22 dated 24.08.2021 for works under Capex Budget scheme as the same are in violation the Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996.
4. The petitioners submit that these e-NITs have been invited in contravention to the Jammu and Kashmir Panchayati Raj Rules, 1996, even with regard to those works which are less than of Rupees Three Lacs. The Panchayati Raj Rules provide that all works may be executed by Halqa Panchayat itself an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.