SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(J&K) 519

DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, PUNEET GUPTA
State of J&K – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Taj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, GA.
For the Respondent:Mr. Navneet Dubey, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

Puneet Gupta, J.

The appellant-State has filed the appeal against judgment dated 11.12.2012, passed by the court of learned Sessions Judge, Poonch, whereby the respondent has been acquitted of the charges framed under Sections 302/449 RPC read with Sections 7/25/26/27 Indian Arms Act on the grounds: that the judgment is against law and facts of the case; that the trial court has misappreciated the prosecution evidence and misconstrued the law attracted to the facts of the case. The appellant seeks reversal of the impugned judgment and consequently conviction of the respondent.

2. The respondent has appeared in the appeal and is represented through counsel.

3. Before proceeding further in the appeal, it is profitable to provide the brief facts of the prosecution case projected before the trial court.

4. The Police Station, Surankote, received an information that Mushtaq Ahmed SPO was deputed at village Khaitan Draba along with two other SPOs. Mushtaq Ahmed along with two other SPOs was present in his house at Khaitan Draba and at about 12.30 AM some militants including Mohd. Taj entered his house. Mohd. Taj is the LET commander of the said organization and was accompanied

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top