IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU
SANJEEV KUMAR, PUNEET GUPTA, JJ.
State - Petitioner
Versus
Ab. Qayoom - Respondent
CRAA No. 24 of 2007
Decided On : 16-03-2021
Acquittal - Criminal Law - Sections 302/120-B/121/122/123/449 RPC read with Sections 4/27 and 7/25 Arms Act - The court discussed the legal provisions related to the charges framed against the respondent under various sections of the RPC and Arms Act. It highlighted the importance of proving the case beyond a shadow of doubt and the legal grounds for acquittal. The court also addressed the jurisdictional issue related to the charges under Sections 121, 122 & 123 RPC.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the appeal against the acquittal of the respondent who was charged with various offenses including murder and arms-related charges. The prosecution's evidence, including the testimony of a key witness, was found to be contradictory and unreliable by the court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the case against the accused beyond a shadow of doubt. It also noted that the charges framed under certain sections of the RPC were without jurisdiction, leading to the acquittal of the respondent.
Issues: The issues included the reliability of the prosecution evidence, the identification of the accused, and the jurisdictional compliance related to certain charges.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of proving the case beyond a shadow of doubt and highlighted the legal grounds for acquittal. It also addressed the jurisdictional issue related to certain charges under the RPC.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the acquittal of the respondent was upheld.
JUDGMENT :
Puneet Gupta, J.
1. The appellant-State has preferred the appeal against the judgment dated 09.02.2007, passed by the court of Principal Sessions Judge, Rajouri, whereby the respondent has been acquitted of the charges framed against him under Sections 302/120-B/121/122/123/449 RPC read with Sections 4/27 and 7/25 Arms Act in a case arising out of F.I.R. 220/2003 registered with Police Station, Rajouri on 19.05.2003 on an information received from reliable, source that some unknown militants on the intervening night of 18/19th May, 2003 entered the house of Mehboob Bakerwal, resident of Nagrota Chowkian Mohra Khet, and killed Khatoon Begum, Haniefa Begum, Zakir, Rashid Ahmad, Maroof, and Mumtaz Begum by slitting their throats with knife and the dead bodies are lying on spot. The investigation was conducted and on the completion of the same charge sheet came to be presented before the court of learned District Mobile Magistrate, Rajouri, who committed the case to the Court of Sessions, Rajouri as the offences were exclusively triable by the court of Sessions.
2. The appeal was filed on the grounds: that judgment is passed against law and facts of the case, the trial court has not appreciated the prosecution evidence and though the prosecution witnesses fully corroborated and supported the case of the prosecution and successfully proved the allegations against the respondent yet the respondent was acquitted of the aforesaid offences.
3. The charges framed were denied by the respondent Abdul Qayoom (referred as accused in the appeal), and thereupon the prosecution was directed to produce its evidence to prove the charges in support of its case. Before proceeding further, it may be mentioned herein that the respondent, Abdul Qayoom, was made accused in the case though not named in the F.I.R. on the basis of investigation carried out in the present case. The respondent, Abdul Qayoom, was found to have links with militants and also worked as their guide. Two militants, namely, Saif Ullah and Wazir Khan, from Pakistan are stated to have visited the house of Abdul Qayoom on the intervening night of 4-5th May, 2003 and he took those two persons to the house of Wazir Hussain, who is Army Personnel, and stayed there as the threat was extended by those persons. The next day when Wazir Hussain came to know of Abdul Qayoom having brought those militants in his house he threatened Qayoom that he will inform the police and Army and get him arrested. Those two above named militants got killed on the same day in the encounter near the house of Wazir Hussain which made the accused Abdul Qayoom suspicious about the Wazir Hussain and his family members regarding providing information to the police and army and got them killed and that they will get the accused Abdul Qayoom arrested. As Abdul Qayoom suspected Wazir Hussain and his family in the elimination of the two militants and that he will also be arrested, therefore, on the intervening night of 18/19th May, 2003 the accused Abdul Qayoom along with three unknown militants came to the house of Wazir Hussain but as the house was locked they went to the house of Mehboob Bakerwal, father of Wazir Hussain, and killed four ladies and two children by slitting their throats. The militants belonging to Jaish-e-Mohammad could not be identified and the challan came to be filed against the respondent, Abdul Qayoom.
4. The prosecution examined number of witnesses in support of its case. The brief account of the depositions of the witnesses is as under :
AI
The importance of proving the case beyond a shadow of doubt and the legal grounds for acquittal.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, the presumption of innocence, and the limited scope of interference with....
(1) Burden of proof lies on parties who substantially asserts affirmative of issue and not upon party who denies it – In criminal cases it is for prosecution to bring guilt home to accused.(2) About ....
The acquittal of the accused was upheld due to insufficient evidence and contradictions in eyewitness testimony, emphasizing the need for corroboration in criminal cases.
The presumption of innocence remains paramount, and an acquittal can only be overturned if the trial court's findings are perverse or unsupported by evidence.
The prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt; inconsistencies in witness testimony and lack of evidence led to the acquittal of the appellants.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.