In The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh at Srinagar
Sanjeev Kumar, J.
Vessu Welfare Committee and Others – Appellant
Versus
Relief and Rehabilitation Commissioner and Others – Respondent
WP(C) 95/2021 c/w WP(C) 140/2021, WP(C) 867/2021, WP(C) 1016/2021, WP(C) 1527/2021
Decided on : 5-7-2022
Jammu and Kashmir Public Premises (Eviction of unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1988 – Section 12 – Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 – Constitution of India – Article 226 – Eviction from public premises – “Migrants vs. migrants’ dispute” – Petitioners have, without any authority or authorization, entered under-construction quarters raised at Transit Camp, Vessu, for providing additional accommodation to migrant employees serving in District of Kulgam – All petitioners are in possession of accommodation allotted to them in year 2010 and afterwards – Petitioners occupied, locked and took possession of residential quarters constructed by Government while retaining their earlier accommodation – Petitioners do not deserve any lenience or protection from Courts of law – Writ Petitions dismissed. (Paras 15, 16, 17, 22, 23 and 24)
Judgment :
WP(C) No.95/2021
This petition is primarily directed against the communication of respondent No.3 (Tehsildar Relief & Rehabilitation (Migrants), Srinagar) dated 17.01.2021 directing the SHO, P/S Qazikund, Kulgam to register an FIR against the petitioners for having entered upon and occupied the under construction quarters at Migrant Colony, Vessu, illegally. The petitioners, beside being aggrieved of the aforesaid communication, also seek a direction to the respondents to adopt a reasonable criteria for allotment of accommodation to the migrant employees appointed under Prime Minister’s Special Package for rehabilitation and return of the migrants to the Valley. The petitioners have also voiced their grievance against the manner in which the respondents have made the allotment of 200 and odd units that have come up at Transit Camp Vessu, District Kulgam.
2. The Department of Relief and Rehabilitation (respondent Nos.1 to 3) as also respondent No.4 (JK PCC Ltd.) have contested the writ petition. In the reply affidavit filed on behalf of Relief and Rehabilitation Department i.e respondent Nos. 1 to 3, their precise stand is that the petitioners, who are already having pre-fab accommodation at Transmit Camp Vessu, have illegally and unauthorisedly entered into the under construction quarters and are, therefore, rank trespassers. They are not only required to be evicted from their unauthorized occupation, but are also required to be proceeded for committing criminal trespass over the public property. The respondents have justified the communication of respondent No.3 directing the SHO, P/S Qazikund to register a formal FIR against the petitioners and others, who have taken law into their own hands and committed the offence of criminal trespass.
3. The JK PCC in its reply has submitted that being an executing agency, it has constructed the Government quarters meant for migrant employees appointed under Prime Minister’s package and, therefore, ostensibly there is no grievance raised by the petitioners in their petition against it.
4. In this petition also, the primary grouse of the petitioners is against the communication of respondent No.3 dated 17.01.2021 requesting the SHO Police Station, Qazikund to register an FIR against the petitioners for having illegally entered upon, locked and occupied the under construction quarters at Migrant Colony Vessu. Additionally, the petitioners have called in question a communication of the Relief and Rehabilitation Commissioner (M), Jammu whereby the Executive Engineer, Power Development Department, Anantnag Division has been requested to initiate disciplinary action against the petitioners for having committed misconduct under Jammu and Kashmir Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1956 [“Rules of 1956”). Rest of the reliefs claimed in the petition are, by and large, the same as prayed for in WP(C) No. 95/2021.
5. The reply of Department of Relief and Rehabilitation is on the same lines of the reply submitted to WP(C) No. 95/2021.
WP(C) No. 867/2021
6. The petitioners in this petition are aggrieved of and have assailed the communication of respondent No.2 bearing No. DCRR(M)/Sgr/21/28-32 dated 15.04.2021 whereby the Executive Engineer KPDCL, Kulgam/Qazikund has been requested not to provide any electric connection to the illegal occupants of the under construction quarters at Migrant Colony Vessu. The impugned communication is an offshoot of the alleged trespass by the petitioners in the under construction quarters erected by the respondents at Transit Camp, Vessu, District Kulgam. They are also aggrieved of another communication dated 17.04.2021 issued by the Relief and Rehabilitation Commissioner (M) Jammu to the Deputy Commissioner, Kulgam requesting the latter to intervene in the matter and direct the officers of KPDCL and Jal Shakti Departments not to allow any illegal connection of electricity or water supply to any of the under construction blocks which have been
: A public servant committing a criminal offence of trespassing in Government property is liable to be dealt with sternly.
Eviction of occupants from government quarters requires adherence to due process and respect for constitutional rights, as per Articles 14 and 21.
Eligibility for government accommodation retention requires compliance with specific transfer conditions; court upheld eviction of Kashmiri Migrants not meeting these criteria, affirming equal treatm....
Point of law: Framing a Scheme, under which the petitioner is not eligible, the plea that similar directions need to be issued to Airports Authority of India, is unmerited and is rejected.
Point of Law : retention of the official accommodation - petitioners being ineligible under the Office Memorandum cannot rely on order.
Point of Law : retention of the official accommodation - petitioners being ineligible under the Office Memorandum cannot rely on order.
The court held that a retired employee claiming retention of government accommodation as a Kashmiri migrant failed to meet eligibility due to ownership of alternative property, highlighting strict ad....
The cancellation of an allotment order without notice constitutes a violation of the principles of natural justice, rendering the order null and legally unsustainable.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.