Sham Lal vs Union of India - 2020 Supreme(J&K) 695

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2020 Supreme(J&K) 695

SANJEEV KUMAR
Sham Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Roop Lal.
For the Respondent: Sumeet Bhatia.

JUDGMENT :

SANJEEV KUMAR, J.

1. In this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has, inter-alia, prayed for the following reliefs:

“(i) Writ of Certiorari quashing order dated 19.03.2013 passed by respondent No. 3 without holding an enquiry and affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard.

(ii) Writ of Certiorari quashing order dated 24.07.2014 passed by respondent No. 2 rejecting the appeal of the petitioner in violation of the principles of natural justice and without giving him an opportunity of being heard.

(iii) Writ of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to allow the petitioner to resume his duties/training at CRPF Training Centre in Kerala.

(iv) Writ of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents to allow the petitioner to join his training/services in Kerala and also grant all consequential benefits.

(v) Writ of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents to constitute a Medical Board for examination of the petitioner for his medical fitness in the Central Reserved Police Force.”

2. Facts in brief leading to the filing of this writ petition are: the petitioner was enrolled in CRPF as constable in August 2012 and joined his trainin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document