SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 458

JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT BENCH AT SRINAGAR
Sanjeev Kumar, Moksha Khajuria Kazmi, JJ.
Abdul Rashid Mir & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
U.T. of J&k & Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 1422 of 2021, Civil Miscellaneous No. 4847 of 2021
Decided On : 15-12-2022

Advocates appeared:
Syed Faisal, Advocate, Iqra Khalid, Advocate, Ab. Rashid Malik, Advocate, Rabinder Singh, Advocate

Valid acquisition process under the Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, Svt. 1990, and the unauthorized occupation of acquired land by the petitioners.

Headnote:

Land Acquisition - Possession - Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, Svt. 1990 - Section 4(1), 6 - 118, 121, 122 - The court found that the entire land of the petitioners, including the subject land, had been validly acquired by the respondents in accordance with the due process prescribed under the Act of 1990. The petitioners' occupation of the subject land was deemed unauthorized and illegal, and they were directed to hand over possession to the respondents. The court also ordered the payment of the balance amount of compensation to the petitioners within six weeks and specified the procedure for release and verification of the amount. The petitioners were not entitled to any interest on the balance amount of compensation except for any interest earned if the amount was deposited in a bank or court.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners claimed ownership of land that was notified for acquisition under Section 4(1) of the Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, Svt. 1990. They sought to quash the notification and requested the de-notification of the subject land, which they claimed was not required for the public purpose for which the notification was issued. The respondents had acquired the land and paid compensation for a portion of it, but the petitioners disputed the acquisition of the entire land and the non-payment of the remaining compensation.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the entire land of the petitioners, including the subject land, had been validly acquired by the respondents in accordance with the due process prescribed under the Act of 1990. The petitioners' occupation of the subject land was deemed unauthorized and illegal, and they were directed to hand over possession to the respondents. The court also ordered the payment of the balance amount of compensation to the petitioners within six weeks and specified the procedure for release and verification of the amount.

Issues: Dispute over the acquisition and compensation of the petitioners' land under Section 4(1) of the Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, Svt. 1990.

Ratio Decidendi: The petitioners' failure to file objections to the acquisition notification and subsequent proceedings, along with their unauthorized occupation of the subject land, led the court to reject their plea for de-notification. The court emphasized the valid acquisition process followed by the respondents and directed the petitioners to hand over possession of the subject land.

Final Decision: The court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Collector Land Acquisition to ensure the payment of the balance amount of compensation to the petitioners within six weeks, ordering the petitioners to hand over possession of the subject land to the respondents, and specifying that the petitioners were not entitled to any interest on the balance amount of compensation except for any interest earned if the amount was deposited in a bank or court.

JUDGMENT

Sanjeev Kumar, J. - The petitioners claim to be the owner in possession of land measuring 3 Kanals and 11 Marlas, falling under Survey No. 118, 121 and 122, situated at Chaimulla Qazigund (the subject land). On 12th July 2006, the respondent no. 3, issued a notification under Section 4(1) under the provisions of Jammu and Kashmir Land Acquisition Act, Svt. 1990 ['the Act of 1990']. The land which was notified for acquisition included land belonging to the petitioners measuring 13 Kanals and 16 Marlas falling under Survey Nos. 118, 121 and 122 situated at Chaimulla Qazigund. It is submitted that the respondents in particular Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag, after issuance of notification 4(1) and complying with rest of the legal formalities prescribed under the Act of 1990, passed a final award in favour of petitioners qua the land measuring 10 Kanals and 5 Marlas only and did not take possession of the rest of the land i.e., subject land. The subject land thus remained in possession of the petitioners. The short grievance projected by the petitioners is that since the respondents do not require subject land for the public purpose for which Section 4(1) notification was issued by the Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag, as such, respondent should formally de-notify the subject land so that the petitioners are in a position to put the said land to a profitable use. It is in this backdrop the petitioners inter alia pray for quashing of Section 4(1) notification and also seeking a direction to the respondents to de-notify the subject land which was part of acquisition notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Act of 1990. The petitioners claim that they have received compensation only in respect of land measuring 10 Kanals and 5 Marlas out of the total land measuring 13 Kanals and 16 Marlas notified for acquisition under Section 4(1) notification of the Act of 1990.

2. On being put on notice, the respondents 1 to 5 have filed their objections. It is submitted that the entire land belonging to the petitioners and others, including 3 Kanals and 16 Marlas (the subject land) was notified under Section 4(1) of the Act of 1990 on 17th May, 2007. After completing all requisite formalities, a final award was passed by the Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag, vide his order No. 83-86/LA/Ang dated 23rd April, 2011. It is submitted that the final award pertains to acquisition of total land measuring 161 Kanals and 12 Marlas including petitioner's land measuring 13 Kanals and 16 Marlas.

3. The compensation has been assessed and paid to the interested persons. The petitioners have also received a sum of Rs. 49, 56,497/-(Forty-nine Lac, Fifty-six Thousand and Five Hundred Ninety Seven) out of the total compensation payable to the petitioners amounting to Rs. 79, 35,000/- (Seventy-Nine Lac and Thirty-Five Thousand). It is further submitted that the rest of the amount was offered to the petitioners, but they are deliberately avoiding to receive the same with an intention to grab the land measuring 3 Kanals 11 Marlas, which the petitioners intend to put to commercial use.

4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material on record, we find that there is no serious dispute between the parties on the facts. Indisputably, land measuring 161 Kanals and 12 Marlas was notified for acquisition vide notification dated 17th May, 2007, read with corrigendum dated 23rd April, 2011, issued under Section 4(1) of the Act of 1990, issued by the Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag. The land of the petitioners measuring 13 Kanals and 16 Marlas falling in different Khasra numbers, the details whereof is given above, was also part of acquisition notified in terms of Section 4(1) of the notification of the Act of 1990. Admittedly, the petitioners did not file any objections to the notification issued under Section 4(1) of the Act of 1990, and the subsequent proceedings for acquisition taken thereupon. The Collector Land Acquisi

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon Back to top