SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(J&K) 104

SANJAY DHAR
Nazir Hussain – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Rahul Raina, Adv.
For the Respondent: Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner has challenged award dated 10.10.2013 in respect of the land measuring 27 kanals and 10 marlas under khasra Nos. 714, 717, 723 and 724 situated at Village Fatehpur, Tehsil and District Rajouri.

2. As per the case of the petitioners, they are owners in possession of the aforesaid land. The respondents vide notification issued Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act issued on 02.01.2010 notified the aforesaid land for acquisition for the purpose of construction of Battalion Headquarter of J&K Police. It is alleged by the petitioners that the respondents have not followed the procedure prescribed under Section 4 of the Act inasmuch as the publication of the notification has not been undertaken in accordance with the law. It has been further submitted that as a result of this, the petitioners could not file the objections to the said notification and they were not heard. Thus, the declaration under Section 6 of the Act is illegal.

3. According to the petitioners, they came to know about the acquisition proceedings in December, 2013 when the notice under Section 9 and 9A of the Act was issued, whereafter, they filed a writ petition bearing OWP No. 1797/2013, w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top