SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 529

SANJAY DHAR
Imtiyaz Hussain Qadri – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu And Kashmir – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. S. R. Khawar, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Sajad Ashraf, GA., for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner has challenged order dated 25.08.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Srinagar, whereby charges for offences under Section 420, 467 and 471 RPC have been framed against him.

2. It appears that after investigation of FIR No.22/2016 registered with Police Station, Ram Munshi Bagh, Srinagar, a charge sheet for offences under Section 420, 467 and 471 RPC came to be filed by the respondents before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Srinagar (hereinafter referred to as the trial court). It was alleged in the charge sheet that on 05.03.2016, a written complaint was lodged by Manager, JKSFC, Srinagar, before the respondent Police Station, alleging therein that the Corporation has received a complaint that the petitioner, who was working as a Manager in JKSFC Camp office Durga Nag, Srinagar, has managed his appointment on the basis of fake date of birth certificate. On the basis of this complaint, FIR was registered and the investigation was set into motion. After investigation of the case, it was found that the actual date of birth of the petitioner was 1st February, 1955 but the same had been forged by the petitioner to make it as 1st of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top