SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 597

RAJNESH OSWAL, RAJESH SEKHRI
State of Jammu & Kashmir – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Naseer – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. R. S. Jamwal, AAG, for the Appellant; None., for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Oswal-J. - This criminal acquittal appeal arises out of the judgment dated 16.02.2012 passed by the court of Principal Sessions Judge, Rajouri (hereinafter to be referred as the trial court) in file No. 21/Sessions, titled, State vs. Mohd. Naseer and others, arising out of FIR No. 357/2010 of Police Station, Rajouri, whereby the respondents have been acquitted of the charges for commission of offence under sections 8, 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the Act).

2. The judgment has been assailed on the ground that the learned trial court has failed to appreciate the prosecution evidence in its true and correct perspective and the conclusion drawn by the learned trial court is against the weight of the evidence brought on record by the prosecution.

3. Mr. R. S. Jamwal, learned AAG appearing for the appellant vehemently argued that the prosecution had proved the recovery of contraband from the respondents by leading cogent evidence and the opinion of the expert also substantiated that the recovered material is narcotics substance, therefore, the judgment impugned is not sustainable in the eyes of law.

4. Heard and perused the record.

5.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top