SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(J&K) 753

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
RAJNESH OSWAL, RAJESH SEKHRI, JJ.
Union Territory of J&K – Petitioner
Versus
Saleem Mohd. – Respondent
Crl. Appeal (AD) No. 08 of 2022
Decided On : 22-09-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: R.S. Jamwal.
For the Respondent: Asheesh Singh Kotwal.

IMPORTANT POINT
In narcotics cases, the prosecution must establish a clear chain of custody and present all relevant witnesses, including the Investigating Officer and FSL expert, to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Headnote:

NARCOTIC DRUGS - ACQUITTAL APPEAL - Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 8, 20 - The court discussed the provisions of Sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, which pertain to the prohibition of certain narcotic drugs and the penalties for their possession. The court emphasized the necessity of proper evidence, including the examination of the Investigating Officer and the FSL expert, to establish the chain of custody of the seized contraband. The lack of such evidence led to the conclusion that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, influencing the court's decision to uphold the acquittal.

Fact of the Case:

The appellant challenged the acquittal of Saleem Mohd. by the trial court for possession of 250 grams of charas, recovered during a police patrol. The prosecution argued that the evidence supported the conviction, while the defense contended that key witnesses, including the Investigating Officer and FSL expert, were not examined, undermining the prosecution's case.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the prosecution's case was significantly weakened by the non-examination of the Investigating Officer and the FSL expert, which is critical in NDPS cases. The court noted that there was no evidence of safe custody of the seized contraband, leading to the conclusion that the trial court's acquittal was justified.

Issues: Whether the trial court erred in acquitting the respondent despite the recovery of contraband, and whether the prosecution established a proper chain of custody and evidence to support the conviction.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the non-examination of the Investigating Officer and the FSL expert is fatal to the prosecution's case in NDPS matters, as it raises doubts about the integrity of the evidence and the chain of custody of the seized contraband.

Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the trial court's judgment of acquittal due to insufficient evidence to support the prosecution's claims.

JUDGMENT :

RAJNESH OSWAL, J.

1. This criminal acquittal appeal is directed against the judgment dated 30.10.2019, recorded by the court of the Principal Sessions Judge, Reasi (hereinafter to be referred as the trial court) in file No. 13/Sessions, titled State vs. Saleem Mohd. whereby the respondent has been acquitted of the charges for commission of offence under sections 8 and 20 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the Act) in FIR No. 57/2016 of Police Station, Reasi.

2. The judgment has been assailed on the ground that the learned trial court has not appreciated the evidence led by the prosecution in its right perspective during trial and has not rightly acquitted the respondent.

3. Facts as they emerge from the charge sheet are that on 18.04.2016, Police Patrolling Party headed by the SHO, Police Station, Reasi, during patrolling, apprehended the accused at Bhaga, when he on seeing the Police Party tried to run away from the spot, but was apprehended and on personal search, 250 grams charas hidden in corn cobs was recovered from his possession. A docket was sent for registration of FIR to the Police Station. Pursuant to docket, FIR bearing No. 57/2016 for commission of offences under section 8 and 20 of the Act was registered. Investigating Officer visited the spot and seized the contraband and he also extracted the samples out of the contraband and sent to the FSL for chemical analysis. After completion of the investigation, charge sheet was filed on 11.07.2017, before the trial court. The charge for commission of offences under section 8 and 20 of the Act was framed against the respondent vide order dated 07.09.2016. As the respondent did not plead guilty, the prosecution was directed to lead evidence. The prosecution had cited as many as 9 witnesses out of which, the prosecution examined only 5 witnesses.

4. Mr. R.S. Jamwal, learned AAG appearing for the appellant vehemently argued that the prosecution has proved the recovery of contraband beyond any shadow of doubt from the respondent but the learned trial court has wrongly acquitted the respondent.

5. Per contra, Mr. Asheesh Singh Kotwal, learned counsel for the respondent vehemently argued that neither the Investigating Officer nor the FSL expert has been examined, as such, there is no illegality or impropriety in the judgment passed by the learned trial court.

6. Heard and perused the record.

7. PW-1 Sansar Singh stated that on 18.04.2016, he along with other police officials was on patrolling duty, while going towards Bhaga accused was stopped, who was on foot and tried to run away, but was apprehended and from his possession, 12 numbers of corn cobs containing charas like substance was recovered and the weight of the contraband was 250 grams out of which 20 grams was extracted as sample for FSL analysis. In cross examination, he stated that the accused was arrested by him and Naresh SHO and accused was searched by constable Pardeep. He had gone to Police Station in Police vehicle with docket. The contraband was weighed by ASI Vishal. The place where charas was weighed was surrounded by many shops and residential houses and on spot, number of civilians had gathered.

8. PW-2 Pardeep Singh has deposed on similar lines. He proved the supurdnama of the weighing scale and supurdnama of ring. He also stated that samples were drawn from charas for FSL examination and three packets/plandas marked as A, B and C were prepared. During cross examination, he stated that the accused was searched by SHO himself. No civilian was summoned on spot. The corn cobs were counted by SHO.

9. PW-3 Naresh Sharma stated that on 18.04.2016, during the naka at Bhaga, the respondent was caught and he was checked by SHO and from his possession one envelope containing 12 challies of charas were recovered. SHO addressed a docket to Police Station in this respect where from SI Vishal Singh came on spot and prepared the seizure memo of the charas on spot. The charas was weighe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top