Back
WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
Gull Mohammad Bhat – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar Goyal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. An Application has been preferred by the Applicant/Respondent No. 1 (petitioner herein) under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 2 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for allegedly causing obstruction in the administration of justice.
2. As per the stand of the Applicant, the Union Territory of J&K has preferred a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India which has been registered as CM(M) No. 178/2022 in which this Court vide order dated 16.09.2022 has been pleased to observe as under:-
3. The case of the Applicant is that the Court of Principal District Judge, Anantnag has directed the Collector to deposit the amount in Court along with interest @ 6% for the first year from the date of taking over the possession and further interest @ 10% per annum for the subs
Availing legal remedies does not amount to obstruction in the course of justice, and filing a contempt petition on false and flimsy grounds and suppressing material facts is an abuse of process of th....
The court must be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the contemnor has willfully, deliberately and intentionally violated the court's order. If the disobedience is the result of some compelling c....
Contempt - Appellant can be exonerated for contempt of court giving benefit of doubt as he tendered unconditional apologies sincerely for the delay in implementation of the order of the court with al....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
