ASHUTOSH SHASTRI, J. C. DOSHI
NATVARLAL DEVCHANDBHAI KABRAWALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present contempt petition under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, is filed under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with provisions under the Contempt of Courts Act, for seeking the following reliefs:
(b) Your Lordships may be pleased to hold the Respondents no. 2 and 3 guilty of willfully disobeying the order dated 03.02.2023 passed by this Hon’ble Court in Special Criminal Application No. 1661 of 2023 as well as the directions of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh and may further be pleased to pass an order of punishment against the Respondents no. 2 and 3 under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 in the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.
(c) Your Lordships may be pleased to pass any other and further relief deemed just and proper be granted in the interest of justice.”
2. The background of fact which has given rise to this petition is that a dispute arose with respect to land bearing Survey No. 72/1 admeasuring 1 acre 15 gunthas at Vesu village District Surat. The origin
Anil Ratan Sarkar vs. Hirak Ghosh
Ashok Paper Kamgar Union vs. Dharam Godha
Bank of Baroda vs. Sadruddin Hasan Daya
Chordia Automobiles vs. S. Moosa
Lalita Kumari vs. Government of Uttar Pradesh
National Fertilizers Ltd. vs. Tuncay Alankus
Niaz Mohammad vs. State of Haryana
Rakapalli Raja Ram Gopala Rao vs. Naragani Govinda Sehararao
S. Sundaram Pillai vs. V.R. Attabiraman
State of Orissa vs. Mohd. Illiyas
Sushila Raje Holkar vs. Anil Kak
Sahdeo vs. State of U.P. (2010) 3 SCC 705
Three Cheers Entertainment (P) Ltd. vs. CESC Ltd. (2008) 16 SCC 592
Civil contempt involves willful disobedience of a court order, requiring intentional actions with knowledge of consequences; negligence is not sufficient for contempt.
Point of Law : Extent of disobedience of law can be stated to be nothing less than contempt of Court, thereby, bringing down the majesty of law and making a mockery of the temple of justice.
The significance of respecting undertakings given to the court and the consequences of persistent breach of consent decrees in property disputes.
Public officials must comply with court orders; failure constitutes civil contempt and invites punishment.
Consent decrees are enforceable under contempt law and violations constitute contempt regardless of their nature of acceptance.
Contempt proceedings cannot address merits of disputes but focus solely on willful disobedience of explicit court orders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.