IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Mohan Lal, J.
Sunil Kumar – Petitioner
Versus
UT of J&K & Ors. – Respondents
Bail App No. 416 of 2021
Decided On : 31-03-2023
BAIL - Criminal Procedure - Code of Criminal Procedure - Section 439, Indian Penal Code - Section 376, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act - Section 4 - [SUMMARY] The court discussed the factors to be considered while deciding bail application in non-bailable offences and concluded that the accused should not be granted bail due to the serious nature of the offence, the likelihood of the accused absconding, and the danger of the course of justice being thwarted. The court emphasized the gravity of the offence of rape and the need to deal with such cases with severity and iron hands.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought bail in a case involving charges of rape under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act. The petitioner claimed to be falsely implicated in the case and argued for bail based on personal liberty and the presumption of innocence.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that there were prima facie grounds to believe that the accused had committed the offence of rape, and the nature and gravity of the charge were very serious. The court also noted the severity of the punishment and the danger of the accused absconding if released on bail.
Issues: The issues involved the consideration of bail in a non-bailable offence, the nature and gravity of the charge, the likelihood of the offence being repeated, and the danger of the accused absconding or fleeing from justice.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the seriousness of the offence of rape and the need to balance individual liberty with the interest of society. It highlighted the importance of not granting bail in cases involving violence against women and minor children, and the need to deal with such cases with severity and iron hands.
Final Decision: The bail application was disallowed, rejected, and dismissed, and the trial court was directed to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible.
JUDGMENT :
1. Petitioner has sought regular bail in terms of Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the 'Code') in case FIR No. 112/2021 registered with Police Station Katra for commission of offences punishable under sections 376 IPC r/w Section 4 of POCSO Act. It is averred, that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case, respondent No. 3 filed a false and frivolous complaint against the petitioner on instigation by respondent No. 4 who is working as teacher and manipulates a story to dragged the petitioner in heinous offence, whereby, petitioner has been arrested on 24.06.2021 after six (6) days from the date of alleged occurrence of 18.06.2021; petitioner is an innocent person has done nothing in connection with crime, in fact dispute between the petitioner and respondents. 3 & 4 is civil in nature in regard to a passage towards the house of respondent No. 4 which does not exist in revenue records, however, they were quarreling and fighting for the said dispute but compromised amicably on 26.06.2021. It is averred, that the petitioner was working as a laborer, few years back from the date of alleged occurrence he decamped stones with the tractor trolley near his house where the passage passed through towards the house of respondent Nos. 3 & 4, on this they were irritated and had a planned to put the petitioner behind the bar, ultimately with the help of police they succeeded and detained him illegally in police custody in Police Station Katra since 24.06.2021 and now he is languishing in District Jail Reasi, petitioner is the only earning members of the family and due to his arrest, the family members are at the verge of starvation, Challan is pending in the court of Ld. Principal Sessions Judge Reasi, petitioner is ready to furnish personal and surety bonds to the satisfaction of this Court and undertakes to abide by all the terms and conditions imposed by this court.
2. Respondent/UT of J&K has opposed the bail on the grounds, that accused has committed heinous offence against society and any concession of bail to him would not be in the interest of the society at large. It is contended, that on 24.06.2021 complainant Rakesh Kumar S/o Lashu Ram R/o Village Nali Kandyar Tehsil Katra District Reasi alongwith his minor daughter whose age is approximately 10 years came in Police Post Kakryal, filed an application written in Urdu to I/C P/P Kakryal, wherein it stated that on 18th of June in the afternoon his daughter/prosecutrix went at 'Nali' for taking water with her younger brother aged 05 years, and at that time the complainant was at his home, in the meantime, suddenly one person namely Sunil Kumar S/o Gian Chand R/o Kandayar came on the spot and committed rape with his daughter/prosecutrix forcefully, and threatened her that if she disclose about the incident at home, he will kill her. It is contended, that his daughter is underage and is not aware of social cause, effect and she did not narrate at home about the incident, and on 23rd of June her daughter narrated about the incident, due to which he delayed to give report, on the basis of application, offences under section 376 IPC and 4-POCSO Act have been made out and the report of cognizable offence entered in the Daily Diary and DD extract submitted to SHO Police Station Katra through SPO Karan Singh No. 562-RSI with request to lodge FIR. It is stated, that as per the contents of DD extract and request of I/C PP Kakryal, a case FIR No. 112/2021 under section 376 IPC & 4-POCSO Act stands registered and investigation of the case was entrusted to I/C P/P Kakryal Inspector Vishal Dogra PID No. ExJ-109535, during investigation of the case I.O visited the spot, prepared the site plan, I.O got conducted the medical examination of the victim through MO CHC Katra, I.O collected the vaginal slides of the victim sent at FSL Jammu for chemical analysis and expert opinion, during further course of investigation I.O recorded the statement
State of U.P. VS. Amarmani Tripathy
State of Karnataka Vs. Putaraj
Rajesh Ranjan Yadav @ Pappu Yadav VS. CBI through its Director
Gudikanti Narasimula and others, v. Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need to consider the seriousness of the offence, the likelihood of the accused absconding, and the interest of society in cases involving viole....
The court emphasized that the severity of the crime and potential interference with the investigation justify the denial of bail, aligning individual liberty with societal safety.
(1) Bail application – In case of non-bailable offences which do not carry a sentence of death or imprisonment for life in alternative, bail is a rule and its denial an exception.(2) Presumptions und....
The court emphasized that bail should be denied in serious offences like rape, highlighting the severity of the charge, nature of evidence, and potential for witness tampering as critical considerati....
Bail denied in heinous POCSO offence involving minor rape due to prima facie case, accused's absconding history risking flight, and no undue trial delay despite charge-sheet and witness examination.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the presumption of innocence, grant of bail as a general rule, and deprivation of personal liberty must be considered as punishment. The court....
Bail denied in rape of intellectually disabled victim as prima facie case established by corroborated victim statement, medical evidence, site blood stains; heinous offence with life imprisonment pun....
The main legal point established is that bail is the rule and jail is an exception, and the accused should not be detained as a form of punishment.
The main legal point established is the need for sound reasoning and consideration of relevant factors in granting bail, especially in cases involving serious offences and statutory presumptions of g....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.