Back
JAVED IQBAL WANI
Suraj Chand – Appellant
Versus
Bajaj Allianz Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Through the medium of instant application, applicant seeks condonation of 1538 days delay in filing the appeal against award dated 30.04.2014 passed by Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Udhampur (herein, for short ‘tribunal’) in case titled “Bansi Lal vs. Ashok Kumar & Ors.”
2. The facts giving rise to the filing of the instant application emerging from the record would reveal that the Respondent No. 2 herein filed a claim petition under Motor Vehicles Act 1988 against the applicant herein for the injuries sustained by him on account of vehicular accident dated 30.10.2008. The applicant herein having been impleaded as Respondent in the said claim petition, being the owner of the vehicle came to be summoned by the tribunal upon entertaining the claim petition on 03.06.2010 and again afresh on 31.07.2010.
3. It is stated in the application that the applicant upon receipt of notice(s) from the tribunal in the claim petition, engaged a counsel for contesting the claim petition, who is stated to have promised the applicant herein to represent him before the tribunal and inform him about the progress of the case and that on account of such promise and assurance, the applicant remai
The court emphasized the need for a sufficient and satisfactory explanation for condonation of delay and highlighted the importance of a justice-oriented approach and diligence in filing appeals agai....
The court emphasized that the delay in filing an appeal must be satisfactorily explained and that the party seeking condonation of delay must approach the court with clean hands.
The decisive factor in condonation of delay is the sufficiency of a satisfactory explanation, and diligence and commitment are crucial in filing appeals, especially in cases related to compensation f....
Condonation of delay should be granted when sufficient cause is established, emphasizing that substantial justice prevails over technical procedural errors. A litigant should not suffer or be penaliz....
The court maintains discretionary authority to condone delays in legal filings when satisfied that the delay resulted from the negligence of legal counsel rather than the litigant. Liberal interpreta....
A litigant must demonstrate reasonable diligence in seeking justice; mere belief in counsel's actions does not suffice as sufficient cause to condone lengthy delays.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for a sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the prescribed period, emphasizing the need for a justice-oriented appr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
