Back
ALI MOHAMMAD MAGREY
Mohammad Fayaz Sheikh – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of JK – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The Petitioner claims to have successfully contested the Panchayat Elections of 2018 having secured 520 votes out of 950. It is stated that, thereafter, the Petitioner contested for the post of Sarpanch in Khowerpara “A”, Tangdhar and was declared elected as such by the electorate of Panches of Halqa Panchayat. On 23rd of July, 2021, a notice of intention to move a motion for the removal of the Petitioner as Sarpanch under Section 7 is stated to have been served upon Respondent No.8 signed by 1/3rd majority of the total number of Panches of Halqa Panchayat. On 24th of July, 2021, a meeting notice was served to all the concerned members, including the Petitioner vide No. SPH/KHA/31-35 dated 24th of July, 2021, for remaining present at the Panchayat Office in Panchayat Khowerpora-A on 26th of July, 2021 at 11:00 AM. Thereafter, on 26th of July, 2021, as stated, the said meeting presided by the Respondent No.4 was conducted, wherein notice for want of confidence was read out in presence of the Petitioner and Panchayat Members and it was unanimously decided to conduct a special meeting on want of confidence on 9th of August, 2021 as per Section 7 of the Panchayati Raj Act, 19
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the removal of a Sarpanch or Naib Sarpanch must adhere to the prescribed procedure under the Panchayati Raj Act, and the will of the majority ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of ratification in the Gram Sabha for a no confidence motion passed against a directly elected Sarpanch, as per the amended provision....
The importance of adhering to procedural requirements for no confidence motions, the significance of majority opinion, and the discretionary powers of the court in such matters.
The court's decision was based on the finding that the petitioner had misused powers and authorities given to the local body, and there was no reason to interfere in the impugned motion of no confide....
The legitimacy of a no-confidence motion is upheld unless proven procedurally flawed to the extent of causing substantial prejudice.
Mandatory compliance with statutory deadlines in No Confidence Motion procedures is essential for legality.
The main legal principle established is that the provision for a no confidence motion against a directly elected Sarpanch is rational, reasonable, and in line with democratic principles, providing ac....
Previous no-confidence motions must be rejected on merits to bar future motions under Chhattisgarh law.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
