SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(J&K) 227

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Sanjeev Kumar, Mohan Lal, JJ.
Amresh Singh son of Angrez Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K through Commissioner/Secretary to Government Education Department J&K and ors. – Respondents
LPA No. 218, 219, 223 of 2018, LPA No. 46 of 2019
Decided On : 12-10-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Ajay Kumar Advocate, Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
For the Respondent:Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG, Mr. Achal Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Ajay Kumar Advocate.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Courts of equity have no place for litigants who manipulate the law to suit their needs, and the cessation of the concept of PRC in UT of Jammu and Kashmir with the J&K Reorganization Act, 2019, and the entitlement of citizens to obtain Domicile Certificates under the Jammu and Kashmir Grant of Domicile Certificate (Procedure) Rules, 2020.

Headnote:

PRC - Residence Eligibility for ReT Scheme - J&K Reorganization Act, 2019 - [Government Order No. 396 of Edu 2000 dated 28.04.2000, J&K Reservation Act 2004, Jammu and Kashmir Grant of Domicile Certificate (Procedure) Rules, 2020] - The court discussed the eligibility criteria for engagement of ReTs under the ReT Scheme, emphasizing the requirement that a candidate must belong to the village where there is a staff deficiency. The judgment also highlighted the cessation of the concept of Permanent Resident Certificate (PRC) in the UT of Jammu and Kashmir with the J&K Reorganization Act, 2019, and the entitlement of citizens to obtain Domicile Certificates under the Jammu and Kashmir Grant of Domicile Certificate (Procedure) Rules, 2020.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved a dispute over the engagement of ReTs in a primary school, where the appellant challenged the engagement of respondent No.8 based on residency and misrepresentation issues. The Writ Court allowed SWP No. 2360/2010 filed by respondent No.8 and quashed the orders impugned in the said writ petition, while SWP No.2009/2017 and OWP No. 1190/2017 filed by the appellant were dismissed.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellant was entitled to be considered for engagement as ReT in UPS Masri, and the second PRCs obtained by respondent No.8 and his sister by practicing fraud and misrepresentation were deemed to have been cancelled. The court also noted the cessation of the concept of PRC in UT of Jammu and Kashmir and the entitlement of citizens to obtain Domicile Certificates.

Issues: The core issues were whether respondent No.8 was actually and physically residing in the revenue village Masri at the time of the issuance of the Advertisement Notification, and whether the conduct of respondent No.8 justified the exercise of equitable jurisdiction vested in the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the material taken into consideration by the Deputy Commissioner was not sufficient to establish that respondent No.8 was actually and physically residing in village Masri at the time of the issuance of the notification. The court also emphasized that the Courts of equity have no place for litigants who manipulate the law to suit their needs.

Final Decision: LPA No.223/2018 and LPA No. 46/2019 were allowed, setting aside the order dated 03.12.2018 passed in SWP No. 2360/2010. LPA No. 219/2018 was allowed, setting aside the order dated 03.12.2018 passed in SWP No. 2009, and OWP No. 1190/2017 was also allowed, quashing the impugned Government Orders. The second PRCs obtained by respondent No.8 and his sister were deemed to have been cancelled. The court also noted the entitlement of respondents to obtain Domicile Certificates under the Jammu and Kashmir Grant of Domicile Certificate (Procedure) Rules, 2020.

JUDGMENT :

Sanjeev Kumar, J.

LPA No. 218/2018, LPA No. 219/2018 & LPA No. 223/2018

1. These three intra-Court appeals by the appellant are directed against a composite judgment dated 03.12.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court [“the Writ Court”] in SWP No. 2360/2010, SWP No. 2009/2017 and OWP No.1190/2017 whereby the Writ Court has allowed SWP No. 2360/2010 filed by respondent No.8 herein and quashed the orders dated 21.08.2010, 01.09.2010 and 17.09.2010 impugned in the said writ petition, whereas SWP No.2009/2017 and OWP No. 1190/2017 filed by the appellant have been dismissed.

2. Briefly put the facts leading to filing of these appeals are that the Chief Education Officer, Doda vide his Advertisement Notice dated 14.12.2009 invited village-wise applications on prescribed format from the permanent residents of J&K State for engagement of ReTs at village level/Panchayat level/Zone level in various upgraded Primary Schools in different education zones of District Doda. Two posts of ReTs were notified to be filled up in upgraded Primary School, Masri of revenue village, Masri.

3. The appellant and respondent No.8 herein along with others responded to the aforesaid Notification and sought their consideration against the aforesaid two posts of ReT in UPS, Masri. On the basis of eligibility and merit, the Zonal Education Officer, Doda prepared and displayed a tentative list of candidates to be engaged as ReTs in UPS, Masri under SSA Scheme. Respondent No.8 along with one Jamsheed Ahmed were tentatively found entitled to be engaged as ReTs in UPS, Masri. Since the panel was subject to objections, as such, the appellant herein filed written objections to the engagement of respondent No.8 on 19.01.2010 and brought it to the notice of the Authorities concerned that respondent No.8 was actually the resident of village Trown and had, by suppression of material facts, obtained another PRC for village Masri much after the cut-off date mentioned in the Advertisement Notification.

4. The appellant also filed an application before Deputy Commissioner, Doda seeking his indulgence to verify the authenticity and genuineness of PRC certificate issued on 18.01.2010 and RBA certificate issued by the Tehsildar, Doda dated 16.08.2004. On the basis of the complaint received by the Deputy Commissioner, Doda, an enquiry was got conducted through the Assistant Commissioner, Doda who, vide his communication dated 19.05.2010 communicated to the Deputy Commissioner, Doda that respondent No.8 had obtained the second PRC of village Masri by fraudulent means. It was also reported that respondent No.8 and his sister Zahida Parveen had produced wrong affidavit before the Authority concerned that they had not previously obtained any PRC, nor had they made any application in this behalf. The Assistant Commissioner, Doda, thus, recommended cancellation of the second PRC issued in favour of respondent No.8.

5. Acting upon the report of Assistant Commissioner, Doda, the Deputy Commissioner, Doda vide his communication dated 19.05.2010 recommended to the Divisional Commissioner, Jammu for cancellation of the second PRC issued in favour of respondent No.8. The Divisional Commissioner, upon consideration of the recommendations of the Deputy Commissioner, Doda and taking note of the facts and circumstances detailed therein, forwarded the case for cancellation of second PRC to the Administrative Department with the request that same may be placed before the Hon’ble Revenue Minister for passing appropriate orders against respondent No.8 and his sister i.e respondent No.9 herein, besides the Deputy Commissioner, Doda was also directed to register a case for cheating against respondent No.8 and his sister. The Divisional Commisisoner, Jammu also directed the cancellation of appointment of respondent No.8 as ReT. The order passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Jammu was brought to the notice of Chief Education Officer, Doda by the Deputy Commissioner, Doda vide his co

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top