SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(J&K) 14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
M. A. Chowdhary, J.
Mohammad Umar Ullah Rather - Appellant
Versus
State (Now Ut) Of J&k - Respondent
SWP No. 2143 of 2015
Decided On : 03-01-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr R. A. Jan, Senior Advocate with Mr Syed Yahaya, Advocate;
Mr Furqan Yaqoob Sofi, Government Advocate

The court ruled that the Government's ban on ReT engagements rendered the Writ Petition infructuous, emphasizing adherence to prior court judgments regarding residency qualifications.

Headnote:

(A) Education Department Regulations - Government Order No. 919-Edu of 2018 - Engagement of Rehbar-e-Taleem (ReT) Teachers - The Petitioner challenged the validity of the Order dated 29th July 2015 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, asserting it violated prior court directions regarding residency qualifications for ReT positions. The court found that the Respondent Nos. 8 and 9 were residents of Shistergam, thus eligible for selection. The Writ Petition was rendered infructuous due to the Government's blanket ban on ReT engagements following the upgradation of the school. (Paras 1-21)

(B) Writ Jurisdiction - The court emphasized that pending litigation does not affect select panels already approved and that the Government Order does not override court judgments. (Paras 17-18)

Facts of the case:
The Petitioner applied for a ReT position based on an advertisement, but Respondent Nos. 8 and 9 contested the selection process, claiming eligibility based on residency. The Deputy Commissioner confirmed their residency after an inquiry.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the Writ Petition was rendered infructuous due to the Government's ban on ReT engagements and the pending status of the selection panel.

Issues: The main issues included the validity of the Deputy Commissioner's Order and the impact of the Government's ban on ReT engagements.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the Government Order did not affect already approved panels and emphasized the importance of adhering to court judgments.

Result: Writ Petition disposed of as infructuous.

JUDGMENT :

1. The case of the Petitioner, as pleaded in the Petition on hand, is that in terms of Advertisement Notice published in the Daily Rising Kashmir, Srinagar in its edition dated 2nd of May, 2013 as also in the Daily Srinagar Times in its edition dated 4th of May, 2013, applications on plain papers came to be invited from educated youths of Village Shistergam on habitation basis, for having educational qualification of 10+2 and above, with a stipulation that only those candidates having Mathematics and Science background should apply within the cut of date viz. 07 days after the publication of the said Notice.

2. The Petitioner, being possessed of the requisite qualification, submitted his application form supported by the requisite documents for his selection and consequent engagement as Rehbar-e-Taleem (Science) in the newly upgraded Primary School, Shistergam.

3. Accordingly, the candidature of the Petitioner, along with other eligible candidates, was entertained and the selection process, as per the procedure prescribed was undertaken, whereafter, a tentative select list came to be drawn and notified by the Respondent No.5 vide notification published in daily Greater Kashmir in its edition dated 3rd of June, 2013.

4. Thereafter, objections were invited from the aggrieved persons, if any, with respect to the said tentative select list, to be submitted in the office of Respondent No.6.The Respondent Nos. 8 and 9, for the obvious reason of not having any valid cause or reason, either in fact or in law, to contest the legal validity of the tentative select list, chose not to avail the opportunity of objecting to the tentative select list, as afforded vide the aforesaid notification, instead, rushed to this Court by filing Writ Petition bearing SWP No. 1068/ 2023 , thereby impugning the aforesaid tentative select list.

5. In the Writ Petition filed by the Respondent Nos. 8 and 9, they pleaded that they are possessed of the eligibility prescribed as regards the residence in the Advertisement Notice, however, the said assertion, on scrutiny by the concerned Authorities, including the Respondent Nos. 3 and 7, were found to be false and baseless. Resultantly, a team of Officers was appointed to visit the spot and submit a factual report thereof, whereafter, the said team undertook the requisite exercise and, on 7th of February, 2014, submitted a detailed report to the Respondent No.3. However, despite the said report, the Respondent Nos. 8 and 9, in connivance of the official Respondents, were able to obtain and get the requisite State Subject certificates as per their needs and requirements depending upon the post/position advertised. Accordingly, the Writ Petition filed by the Respondent Nos. 8 and 9 was disposed of by this Court vide Judgment dated 29th of May, 2015, whereafter, in purported compliance of the said Judgment passed by this Court, the Respondent No.3-Deputy Commissioner, Anantnag issued Order No. DCA/Lit/015-382-84 dated 29th of July, 2025.

6. The Petitioner has assailed the validity of the aforesaid Order dated 29th of July, 2025 issued by the Respondent No.3 through the medium of the present Writ Petition, primarily, on the ground that the same has been, in fact, issued in violation of the directions passed by this Court vide Judgment dated 29th of May, 2015. It has been stated during the course of the proceedings in the Writ Petition filed by the Respondent Nos. 8 and 9, being SWP No. 1068/2013, it had been clearly established that the Petitioners therein/ Respondent Nos. 8 and 9 herein are residents of Village Sheikhpora and not village Shistergam habitation, which fact has not been taken into consideration by the Respondent No.3, while issuing the impugned Order.

7. The Respondent Nos. 1, 2, 5 and 6, in their Objections, have stated that the present Writ Petition involves controversy regarding the engagement of ReTs (Tehbar-i-Taleem)for Upgraded Primary School to the Middle School, Shistergam, however, havin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top