Back
VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
Raman Kumar Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Sanjay Kumar Aggarwal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The instant appeal has been filed against the judgment dated 08.10.2012 (for brevity “impugned judgment”), passed by the Court of learned Principal District Judge, Jammu (for brevity ‘trial Court’) in a civil suit titled As Raman Kumar Aggarwal vs. Sanjay Kumar Aggarwal and others, whereby the civil suit for partition filed by the appellant has been dismissed as not maintainable.
The facts giving rise to the present appeal in brief are as under:-
2. The appellant along with respondent No. 1 and their father Satya Pal Aggarwal were members of joint Hindu family and were running different business concerns and had acquired various moveable and immovable properties either jointly or on individual names of the members of the joint family, having purchased from joint funds of the joint family. A dispute arose between the parties and the appellant filed a suit for declaration and partition before the Court of 2nd Additional District, Judge Jammu on 21.09.2000 being COS No. 10 titled Raman Kumar Aggarwal vs. Satya Pal Aggarwal and others. During the pendency of the suit a compromise was arrived at between the parties and a compromise deed dated 02.02.2001 was executed betwee
The main legal point established in the judgment is the value of family arrangements in resolving disputes and bringing harmony in the family, and the finality of settlements made with the consent of....
In partition suits, a compromise among co-owners is valid even in the presence of third-party claims, provided it does not extinguish their rights.
(1) Daughter has been recognised and treated as a coparcener by birth with equal rights and liabilities as of that of a son – It is not necessary that a coparcener whose daughter is conferred with ri....
Family arrangements promoting peace and preventing disputes are upheld; oral partitions must be substantiated by clear evidence to be enforceable.
A minor can seek partition, but cannot challenge a compromise decree if not a party to it; Lok Adalat awards are binding unless proven otherwise.
The court affirmed the plaintiffs' right to partition of joint family property, ruling that the defendants failed to prove prior partition, and emphasized the necessity of registration for partition ....
Compromise decrees in partition suits involving minors without their inclusion are void and can be challenged based on coercion or lack of lawful procedure.
The family settlement, though unregistered, operated as estoppel against the signatories and partitioned the suit properties among the plaintiff and Defendants 1 to 3. The plaintiff was estopped from....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
