Back
H. P. SANDESH
N. Umesha, S/o Sri Narayanappa – Appellant
Versus
Bhagyamma @ Bhagamma W/O Sri Govindappam – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
This second appeal is filed against the concurrent finding of dismissal of suit filed in O.S.No.4/2009 dated 12.09.2014 and an appeal filed in R.A.No.82/2014 dated 12.10.2017.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. The parties are referred to as per their original rankings before the Trial Court to avoid confusion and for the convenience of the Court.
3. The factual matrix of case of plaintiff before the Trial Court while seeking the relief of declaration, partition and possession, it is contended that late Nagappa is the father of the defendant Nos.1 to 3. The defendant No.4 is the father of the plaintiff. Defendant Nos.1 to 3 have filed suit in O.S.No.91/2006 for partition and separate possession of their shares. The defendant No.4 who is the father of the plaintiff never took interest in managing the family properties and he always yielded to the words of defendant Nos.1 to 3 and addicted to all sort of bad habits. By taking advantage of weakness of defendant No.4, defendant Nos.1 to 3 managed to settle the suit by referring the matter to lok-adalath. The matter was compromised on 16.06.2007 and preliminary decree was passed on 29.06.2007 and
The court reaffirmed that daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral properties, emphasizing the applicability of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act.
Daughters have equal rights as sons in ancestral property under the Hindu Succession Act, 2005, regardless of prior claims of partition.
A party who has relinquished their rights in joint family properties cannot later claim partition or execute a will regarding those properties.
A partition suit must prove ancestral status of properties; claims of prior partition require corroborative evidence, which was insufficient in this case.
The heavy burden of proof upon the proponent of oral partition before it is accepted, as per the settled principle of law by the Apex Court.
A non-party to a suit can challenge a compromise decree obtained through fraud, and the burden of proof lies on the party asserting the validity of claims that affect the rights of non-parties.
The court established that unregistered documents affecting rights in immovable property are inadmissible in evidence, and that joint family properties are subject to partition among all rightful hei....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
