Back
RAJNESH OSWAL, RAHUL BHARTI
Sheeraza Akhter – Appellant
Versus
Nahida Shaheen – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
(Rahul Bharti, J.)
1. A battle for engagement as Rehbar-e-Taleem (“ReT” in short), a post bearing equivalence to ‘teacher’ between the appellant- Sheeraza Akhter and the respondent no. 1-Nahida Shaheen, is so stake involving that it is literally a fight to finish having started in the year 2011. The duel had started when the respondent no. 1’s engagement was questioned by the appellant in her writ petition which led to disengagement of the respondent no. 1, after having served for more than one year then resulting in the purported engagement of the appellant which then came to be challenged by the respondent no.1 in her writ petition in which the learned Single Bench has come to upset the appellant’s engagement with a corresponding direction for restoration of the respondent no.1’s lost engagement. Now, the final battle round is in the present Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) before us bearing pendency lasting more than seven years.
2. Vehement submissions from the contesting parties have been made to add further to the seriousness of the grubstake. Detailing of facts is, therefore, required to be at our end done before we come to examine the soundness of the impugned judgeme
The main legal point established in the judgment is the evaluation of merit for engagement as ReT based on recognized qualifications and the authority's discretion to exclude post-graduation degrees ....
Qualifications for public employment must be valid as of the cut-off date, and long-term service can create an equity favoring regularization despite minor irregularities.
The court affirmed that eligibility for public employment requires meeting qualification criteria by the cut-off date, while also recognizing the principle of equity favoring long-serving employees i....
The recognition of degrees obtained through distance learning from universities with off-campus study centers beyond territorial jurisdiction is subject to the UGC's regulations and public notices.
There is no equivalent Rule akin to Rule 10(a)(ii). A perusal of the said Rule 10(a)(ii) clearly presupposes and provides that the acquisition of a higher qualification would presuppose the acquisiti....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
