IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR & LADAKH AT JAMMU
RAJESH SEKHRI, J.
YatinYadav and Others - Petitioners
Versus
UT of J&K - Respondent
Bail App. No. 96 of 2023
Decided On : 14-07-2023
Section 437 - Statutory Bail - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1978 - Section 167(2) - Summary of Acts and Sections: Section 437 of Cr.P.C., Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C., Section 120-B IPC, Section 420 IPC, Section 411 IPC, Section 408 IPC, Section 201 IPC - The court discussed the provisions of Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. and its relation to Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It emphasized that statutory bail is a fundamental right and analyzed the legal framework to determine the entitlement to statutory bail under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. The court also highlighted the provisions of Section 173 of Cr.P.C. and the power of the Magistrate to take cognizance in terms of Section 190 Cr.P.C. It clarified the completion of investigation and the filing of a charge sheet as prerequisites for determining the entitlement to statutory bail.
Fact of the Case:
The Government of J&K directed an investigation into irregularities in a written examination for the posts of Sub Inspector in the J&K Police. A charge sheet was filed against the petitioners and co-accused for their involvement in the leakage of question papers. The petitioners sought 'default bail' under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C., claiming that the charge sheet was a subterfuge to defeat their right to statutory bail.
Finding of the Court:
The court analyzed the charge sheet and concluded that the investigation and charge sheet with respect to the coordinated conspiracy amongst the petitioners and co-accused for the leakage of question papers were complete. It emphasized that the completion of investigation relating to offences against the charge sheeted accused was material for determining the entitlement to statutory bail. The court dismissed the petition, stating that the benefit of 'Statutory Bail' under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. could not be extended to the petitioners.
Issues: The main issue was whether the charge sheet filed against the petitioners was a subterfuge to defeat their right to statutory bail under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. The court also addressed the completion of investigation and the entitlement to statutory bail.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the analysis of the charge sheet and the legal framework under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. It clarified the completion of investigation and the filing of a charge sheet as prerequisites for determining the entitlement to statutory bail.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed as the court found that the investigation and charge sheet with respect to the coordinated conspiracy for the leakage of question papers were complete, and the benefit of 'Statutory Bail' under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. could not be extended to the petitioners.
JUDGMENT :
1. Petitioners have invoked Section 437 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1978 (for short Cr.P.C.) read with Article 226 of the Constitution of India to implore for their enlargement on statutory bail in terms of Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.
2. Before a closer look at the grounds urged in the present petition, it shall be apt to have an overview of the background facts of the case.
3. The Government of J&K through Deputy Secretary, GAD, directed investigation into allegations of irregularities in written examination for the posts of Sub Inspector in the J&K Police conducted by J&K Services Selection Board (JKSSB), through CBI, on the basis of report of Enquiry Committee constituted by the Government. The stand of the Government is that report of Enquiry Committee prima facie reveals criminal conspiracy amongst officials of JKSSB, M/s Merit Trac, Bengaluru, beneficiary candidates and other accused persons causing gross irregularities in the conduct of written examination for the posts of Sub Inspectors in J&K Police. Consequently, Crime No. RC0042022A0008-CBI/ACM/JAMMU came to be registered under Section 120-B IPC read with Section 420 IPC against officials of J&KSSB, M/s Merit Trac, Bengaluru, beneficiary candidates and other accused persons on 03.08.2022.
4. The investigation culminated into filing of final report in terms of Section 173 Cr.P.C. on 12.11.2022 against 33 accused persons, some unknown private persons, officials of M/s Merittrac Services Private Ltd. and officials of JKSSB in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, (CJM), Jammu It is pertinent to mention that role of each accused has been delineated in the charge sheet. The investigating agency has concluded that accused have committed offences punishable under Sections 420-B IPC read with Sections 420, 411, 408, and 201 IPC.
5. Petitioners preferred separate applications for “default bail” in terms of Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. and learned CJM, Jammu vide impugned order dated 31.01.2023 declined the plea by holding that since charge sheet stands filed, Court has already taken cognizance of the offences, there are sufficient grounds to proceed and case is at the stage of consideration of charge/discharge, therefore, petitioners are not entitled to the default bail.
6. Petitioners have questioned the impugned order passed by learned CJM, Jammu, vide which, their plea for “default bail” has been declined by the trial court, on the solitary premise that learned trial Court has failed to appreciate the real import of Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. According to the petitioners, the investigating agency found two sets of conspiracy. Though it investigated the smaller conspiracy with respect to the petitioners, according to which, petitioners got access of the question papers of Sub Inspector examination and provided the same to beneficiary candidates as also revealed to other accused persons present in Jammu where question papers were circulated, however, the larger conspiracy, as per the report of the Enquiry Committee to unearth the criminal conspiracy amongst officials of JKSSB, M/s Merit Trac, Bengaluru, beneficiary candidates and other accused persons is still underway. Petitioners, by referring to various observations made in the charge sheet have submitted that since investigation into larger conspiracy of the case is admittedly underway, therefore, charge sheet filed by the investigating agency in the trial court is a ruse to defeat the indefeasible right of the petitioners for “default bail” under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.
7. Countervailing the stand taken by the petitioners, the respondent-UT is affront with the contention that accused-petitioner No. 1, Yatin Yadav, being the mastermind, has conspired with rest of the petitioners/accused to leak the question paper and sold the same to the candidates in lieu of money. He is alleged to have entered into a criminal conspiracy with accused-petitioner No.2, Pardeep Kumar, an employee of printing press, namely, M/s KVR Infosy
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State of Maharastra
M. Ravindran v. Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
AI
The completion of investigation and the filing of a charge sheet are prerequisites for determining the entitlement to statutory bail under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C.
(1) Default bail – Once challan has been filed, question of grant of bail has to be considered and decided only with reference to merits of case under provisions relating to grant of bail to accused ....
(1) Default bail – An incomplete charge-sheet filed without completing investigation cannot be used to defeat right of statutory bail under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C.(2) Default bail – Investigative a....
The main legal principle established is that the accused is entitled to default bail if the investigation is not completed within the mandated period, as per the legislative intent of section 167(2) ....
The court emphasized that the filing of a charge-sheet for some offences and stating that investigation was pending for others did not amount to a complete charge-sheet depriving the petitioner of st....
Once chargesheet has been filed within the stipulated time, the question of grant of statutory bail or default does not arise.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.