IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
RAJNESH OSWAL, J.
Rashidul Hassan Gojjer - Petitioner
Versus
Commissioner/Secretary & Ors. - Respondents
CRMC No.98 Of 2018
Decided On : 20-09-2023
Forgery - Scheduled Tribe Certificate - Prevention of Corruption Act - Section 420, 120-B RPC read with Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the FIR registered under Section 420, 120-B RPC read with Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, on the ground that the Scheduled Tribe certificate issued in his favor was genuine. The investigation revealed that the petitioner's caste was fraudulently changed in the revenue records, leading to the issuance of a fake Scheduled Tribe Certificate.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the investigation was justified, as the petitioner had concealed the fact that a similar petition for quashing the FIR had been dismissed earlier. The court also held that the petitioner's ST certificate was issued on the basis of a fake mutation, and the statements of witnesses regarding the petitioner's caste change could not be considered at the stage of quashing the FIR.
Issues: Concealment of material fact, validity of the ST certificate, consideration of witness statements at the stage of quashing the FIR
Ratio Decidendi: The court cannot quash a criminal proceeding if a prima facie case is made out, and the evidence produced by the accused in his defense cannot be considered at the initial stage of the criminal proceedings.
Final Decision: The petition was dismissed without costs, and the Case Diary was returned to the respondents' counsel.
JUDGMENT :
1. The petitioner has questioned the FIR No.25/2012 dated 19th September, 2012, registered by Police Station, Crime Branch, Kashmir, under Section 420, 120-B RPC read with Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, on the ground that the Scheduled Tribe certificate issued by the competent authority in favour of the petitioner is genuine and despite the fact that investigation was closed, as the allegations could not be proved, but still the respondents are continuing with the investigation of the case.
2. In the status report filed by the respondents in the month of July, 2022, it is stated that Police Station, Crime Branch, Kashmir, Srinagar, received a written complaint from Zonal Education Officer, Kulgam, stating therein that one Rashid-ul-Hassan Gojjar S/o Gh. Hassan R/o Arigatnoo Tehsil Kulgam was appointed as Teacher through Service Selection Board under ST category. He had submitted his joining report on 07.11.2007 in the office of Zonal Education Officer, Kulgam, and presented the requisite certificates/documents including Scheduled Tribe Certificate, Permanent Resident Certificate and Date of Birth certificate. On examining the certificates, it was found that the caste of the appointee in DOB certificate is reflected as ‘Wagay’ which contradicts with the caste of ‘Gojer’ reflected in PRC and ST certificate. A preliminary verification was conducted in the matter and it was revealed that the actual caste of the appointee was ‘Wagay’ and he in league with the revenue officials managed to change his caste from ‘Wagay’ to ‘Gojer’ and finally FIR No.25/2012 under Section 420, 120-B RPC read with Section 5(2) of PC Act was registered in Police Station, Crime Branch, Kashmir. During investigation, the statement of Shri Tariq Ahmad Reshi, the then Tehsildar Kulgam was recorded, who stated that during his posting as Tehsildar Kulgam, he received a complaint from Hon’ble Chief Ministers Grievance Cell against the petitioner and, accordingly, enquiry was initiated. During enquiry, the statements of concerned Patwari, Chowkidar and Numberdar of the village were recorded. The said witness further stated that he perused the relevant record/documents relating to issuance of ST certificate in favour of the petitioner. Since the office of Tehsildar, Kulgam was destroyed in a fire incident in February, 2013, so no official record was available in Tehsil Office, Kulgam. He further conducted enquiry into the matter and arrived at the conclusion that a mutation has been wrongly incorporated in Jamabandi and Girdawari of the concerned Halqa. During further investigation, the order dated 24th April, 2012 passed by the accused Tehsildar Mohammad Amin Dar was brought on record and it revealed that the then Tehsildar Settlement, Kulgam, had directed the Patwari concerned to incorporate mutation No.391/1 in Misilisalan of Village Arigatnoo but mutation No.391/1 was non-existent and the Tehsildar misused his official position and directed Patwari concerned to enter a non-existent mutation into revenue record in order to shower undue benefit upon the beneficiary. During further investigation, it was revealed that the ST certificate has been issued on the basis of fake and forged mutation No.391/1 attested by Mohammad Amin Dar, the then Naib Tehsildar. The complicity of the petitioner Rashid-ul-Hassan Gojjar, Ab. Rashid Zargar, Gh. Mohammad Bahroo and Mohammad Amin Dar was established in the preparation of Scheduled Tribe Certificate on the basis of fake revenue record. It is also stated that the mutation No.391/1 dated nil attested by Naib Tehsildar concerned with respect to change of caste from Sheer Gojer to Gojer has been set aside.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Investigating Officers earlier had closed investigation of the FIR as untraced in absence of evidence but without any justification, the respondents are continuing with the investigation. He further submitted that PW Ghulam Nabi Bhat, Number
T.T. Antony v. State of Kerala
The court cannot quash a criminal proceeding if a prima facie case is made out, and the evidence produced by the accused in his defense cannot be considered at the initial stage of the criminal proce....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the significance of genuine reports from vigilance officers in caste certificate scrutiny and the binding nature of such reports on the Caste Ve....
The court established that mere unsigned status of a caste certificate does not equate to forgery without evidence of intent to deceive, and that procedural requirements for prosecution under the Mah....
The court emphasized that documentary evidence, especially pre-independence records, is crucial in establishing caste claims, and the failure to produce valid documentation invalidates the claim.
Criminal proceedings cannot be initiated without prior verification of social status certificates by the Scrutiny Committee as mandated by the Supreme Court.
Point of Law : High Court cannot interfere with investigation in exercise of its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
The principle of double jeopardy applies to prosecutions, not investigations. The Court should sparingly quash investigations, especially when there is no abuse of process or to secure the ends of ju....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.