Back
VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL
State through Additional Advocate General – Appellant
Versus
Jawihara Begum – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This Criminal Acquittal Appeal has been filed against the Judgment dated 31.10.2016 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Handwara, hereinafter referred to as the “Trial Court”, in a case titled as State of J&K through SHO Police Station, Handwara versus Mst. Jawahira Begum, in which accused was facing trial for offence punishable under Section 304 RPC. The Trial court has dismissed the challan and acquitted accused holding that charge framed against her has not been proved. The said judgment, whereby accused has been acquitted, is being challenged in this Appeal precisely on the grounds that the impugned Judgment is based on improper appreciation of evidence; that the evidence produced by the prosecution has proved the charge against the accused beyond any shadow of doubt; that the Trial court has not given any reason, muchless a cogent reason while rejecting the evidence of the prosecution; that Judgment is based on total non-application of mind; that the direct as well as circumstantial evidences produced by the prosecution has established the guilt against the accused; that evidence produced on the record before the Trial court proves the guilt, the
The burden to prove the offence always rests on the prosecution, and the court may rely on the testimony of a single witness if it is wholly reliable. The quality of evidence is emphasized over quant....
Point of Law : Power of an Appellate Court to review evidence in appeals against acquittal is as extensive as its powers in appeals against convictions, but that power is with a note of caution that ....
The prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and credibility of eyewitnesses is essential for conviction.
The appellate court emphasized that acquittals carry a presumption of innocence and that conviction can be based on credible eyewitness testimony, even if it is the sole evidence.
The appellate court emphasized that minor discrepancies in eyewitness testimony do not undermine overall reliability, and the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
