IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL, J.
State through Additional Advocate General - Appellant
Versus
Jawihara Begum - Respondent
CRAA No. 06 of 2018
Decided On : 01-05-2024
Criminal Acquittal Appeal - Offence under Section 304 RPC - [Section 304 RPC] - The court discussed the evidence and concluded that the prosecution failed to prove the charge against the accused beyond reasonable doubt. The absence of medical evidence, inordinate delay in lodging FIR, and absence of corroboration of evidence were key factors leading to the acquittal of the accused. The court emphasized the importance of reliable and trustworthy evidence, stating that the burden to prove the offence always rests on the prosecution.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved the alleged offence of causing death under Section 304 RPC. The accused was acquitted by the Trial Court based on improper appreciation of evidence by the prosecution, absence of medical evidence, and inordinate delay in lodging FIR.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charge against the accused beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing the absence of medical evidence, inordinate delay in lodging FIR, and absence of corroboration of evidence.
Issues: The key issues revolved around the reliability and trustworthiness of the evidence presented by the prosecution, the absence of medical evidence, and the inordinate delay in lodging FIR.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of reliable and trustworthy evidence, stating that the burden to prove the offence always rests on the prosecution. It also highlighted the significance of corroboration of evidence and the quality of evidence over quantity.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and the judgment of acquittal recorded by the Trial Court was maintained and upheld.
JUDGMENT :
1. This Criminal Acquittal Appeal has been filed against the Judgment dated 31.10.2016 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Handwara, hereinafter referred to as the “Trial Court”, in a case titled as State of J&K through SHO Police Station, Handwara versus Mst. Jawahira Begum, in which accused was facing trial for offence punishable under Section 304 RPC. The Trial court has dismissed the challan and acquitted accused holding that charge framed against her has not been proved. The said judgment, whereby accused has been acquitted, is being challenged in this Appeal precisely on the grounds that the impugned Judgment is based on improper appreciation of evidence; that the evidence produced by the prosecution has proved the charge against the accused beyond any shadow of doubt; that the Trial court has not given any reason, muchless a cogent reason while rejecting the evidence of the prosecution; that Judgment is based on total non-application of mind; that the direct as well as circumstantial evidences produced by the prosecution has established the guilt against the accused; that evidence produced on the record before the Trial court proves the guilt, therefore, the accused requires to be convicted and Judgment passed by the Trial court is required to be reversed.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as learned counsel appearing for the respondent and I have also gone through the record and evidence produced before the Trial court.
3. The brief facts of the case are that on 24.03.2001, a written report was received by Police Station Handwara, from complainant, wherein it was alleged that accused caused death of Sarwa Begum wife of complainant by hitting her head with a brick shard which caused injury to her head and ultimately because of such injury, she died. According to the complainant, a cow of the complainant had gone to the pasture on 16.03.2001 for grazing purposes and when the cow returned back, it was found by his wife-deceased that their cow has suffered an injury and impairment of the eye and because of that, she raised abusive language against the accused who reside in their neighborhood. Accused caught hold of his wife and assaulted her head with a pacca brick shard causing injury to her. She was admitted in the hospital at Handwara in an injured condition, wherefrom she was referred to SKIMS, Soura, for treatment and she succumbed to injuries on 23.03.2001.
4. FIR was registered on the basis of the complaint as FIR No. 42 of 2001 for commission of offence punishable under section 302 of the RPC. On conclusion of the investigation, charge sheet was filed against the accused for offence punishable under section 304 RPC. The accused-respondent denied the charge and prosecution was directed to produce the evidence to prove charge against the accused. The prosecution produced the witnesses namely, Khazir Mohamamd Malik, Abdul Rehman Mir, Abdul Rashid Mir, Abdul Gani Mir, Abdul Gani Malik, Mst. Amina Bano, Mohammad Iqbal Malik, Abdul Gafoor Malik, Ghulam Mohammad Mir, Abdul Gani Mir, Mohammad Ahsan Wani, whereas, respondent-accused produced Ghulam Mohammad Malik and Mohammad Ayoub Malik as witnesses in defence. It would be appropriate to examine the witnesses hereinafter :
The burden to prove the offence always rests on the prosecution, and the court may rely on the testimony of a single witness if it is wholly reliable. The quality of evidence is emphasized over quant....
Point of Law : Power of an Appellate Court to review evidence in appeals against acquittal is as extensive as its powers in appeals against convictions, but that power is with a note of caution that ....
The prosecution must establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt and credibility of eyewitnesses is essential for conviction.
The appellate court emphasized that acquittals carry a presumption of innocence and that conviction can be based on credible eyewitness testimony, even if it is the sole evidence.
The appellate court emphasized that minor discrepancies in eyewitness testimony do not undermine overall reliability, and the prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.