Back
SANJEEV KUMAR
Shabnaz Kosser, D/o. Sh. Mohd. Amin – Appellant
Versus
State of Jammu and Kashmir through Chief Secretary, Govt. of J&K, Civil Secretariat, Jammu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. In Phase-3rd of expansion programme of ICDS an Anganwari Centre for hamlet Pandran and Jakala comprised in Ward No.5 and 6 of Panchayat Halqa Badakana ICDS Project Darhal came to be sanctioned. Vide advertisement notification dated 01.07.2010 issued by respondent No.4, applications were invited for engagement as Anganwari Workers/Helpers on honorarium basis for various Anganwari Centres including the Anganwari Centre in question. The petitioner along with respondent No.7 and few others claiming to be the residents of the concerned hamlet submitted their application forms.
2. The application forms submitted by the eligible candidates were scrutinized by the Selection Committee and a list of eligible candidates was prepared in accordance with the procedure laid down by respondents vide Government Order No.07-SW of 2010 dated 18.01.2010 read with corrigendum issued vide Order No.10-SW of 2010 dated 19.01.2010. All the eligible candidates, as is claimed by the official respondents, were interviewed by the then Selection Committee and on the basis of academic merit and performance in the interview, a merit list was prepared. In the provisional select list, a candidate, namel
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of exhausting alternative remedies before invoking extraordinary writ jurisdiction and the significance of documentary evidence in d....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the validity of the selection and engagement of Anganwari Workers based on the residency and selection criteria outlined in the advertisement notic....
Local residency requirements that create artificial discrimination violate the right to equality under Articles 14 and 16(2) of the Constitution of India.
Candidates cannot challenge a selection process after participating in it, as established by previous court decisions.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the importance of considering merit and suitability for appointments, and the court's authority to quash an engagement order and direct the issu....
Engagement orders in public service can be revised when based on a mistake, particularly if misrepresentation affects eligibility.
Eligibility criteria for government positions must be met, and discrepancies in application and residency status can result in the cancellation of appointments.
Selection guidelines take precedence over advertisements in recruitment processes, especially in cases involving designated community preferences.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
